Fluoride wording deleted from bill in Hawaii
Fifty Years of Fluoridation (1945-1995)
Fluoride, teeth and the Atomic Bomb
Fluoride: we all live in a mellow apathy
"Spirit" in Fluor-Land
Increasing Dosage and Long Term Effects
Subject:    [du-list] Fluoride
   Date:     Mon, 11 Feb 2002 11:55:21 -0800
   From:    "vcolley" <vcolley@earthlink.net>
     To:     <bananas@drizzle.com>
    CC:     "DU List" <du-list@yahoogroups.com>
Source: Jim

February 10, 2002

Fluoride wording deleted from bill

By Will Hoover
Advertiser Staff Writer

Yesterday, the state House Committee on Health got an earful from folks who
weren't about to swallow the Department of Health's fluoridation claims.

In an often tumultuous hearing that lasted more than six hours, the panel
heard citizens voice their disapproval of House Bill 2761, which related to
community oral health and included the phrase: "Requires fluoridation of
public water systems."

Committee Chairman Dennis Arakaki, D-28th (Kalihi Valley, Kamehameha
Heights), who attempted at the outset to conduct an orderly discussion of
Hawai'i's dental health needs, finally announced he would recommend that any
mention of the word "fluoridation" be stricken from the bill.

With that change, the committee approved the bill but not before Rep.
William Stonebraker, R-15th (Kalama Valley, Portlock), scolded the Department
of Health for not responding to public concerns about fluoridation and warned
that the agency will get no support from him until "it gets its act

To be sure, there were those who spoke in favor of fluoridation.

"I find it shameful that the residents and especially the children of our
state continue to suffer from a policy that does not support fluoridation,"
said Chuck Larson, executive director of Seagull Schools.

But they were outnumbered by fluoridation foes who came armed with placards,
petitions, surveys, studies and, in one case, a yards-long list of
metropolitan areas that have washed their hands of their own water
fluoridation systems and apparently aren't a bit sorry.

The sources cited included the Centers of Disease Control and Prevention
conclusion that fluoride is effective against cavities only when applied
topically and not if ingested.

Mostly, they expressed consternation at having to address the issue again,
having gone through a similar exercise last year.

"Why are we back here again?" demanded Bobby McClintock, representing a group
of people who are fluoride-sensitive.

"I'm sure you're tired of hearing us say don't put it in the water," Helen
Phillips told the panel. "But we're tired of saying it."

By the time the meeting ended before 4 p.m., civility had returned to the
auditorium and people were lining up to thank Arakaki for dropping the
"fluoride" from the bill.

     It appears the people of Hawaii have learned about fluoride well.
Living on a volcano exposes one to things like heavy metals and fluorides.
These toxic effects impair immunity to pathogens and diseases from endogenous
viruses passed via DNA.

   It was no wonder that when Capt. Cook came to Hawaii and the highly
impacted immune resistance that the islands inhabitants were devistated from
varied diseases the sailors brought.     They had low immunity to disease
that was prevalent in other cultures less isolated, but the immune problems
stemmed from environmental factors linked to living on volcanos.

copyright Tom Swans
niets van deze tekst mag gebruikt worden zonder
toestemming van de auteur





Fluoride is a strong cockroach/rat poison. For the past 50 years the US public has been very convincingly persuaded to ignore the fluoridation issue, but the serious facts about this issue keep repeating themselves, and this situation appears to be degrading. The growing widespread concern over public apathy, and the apparent stupidity of our school children, keeps mounting. This fluoride issue is offered as just one of several important possible answers to that problem.


The Halogen family consists of five chemical elements: Fluorine, Chlorine, Bromine, Iodine and Astatine. (Chlorine and Fluorine are chief ingredients of the CFC's (Chloro-Fluoro-Carbons), that are causing the current controversy with the ozone holes.) Depending upon use and dosage, the Halogens have a varying effect on the human mind, nervous system and metabolism. Examples: One of the most popular current hospital anesthetics, "Halothane", contains Fluorine, Chlorine, and Bromine, and the highly questionable mind-altering psychiatric drug Prozac (Fluoxetene Hydrochloride) contains both Fluorine and Chlorine.


--The Australians reportedly issued Bromide tea to their soldiers in World War II, to decrease their sex urge and thus lower the incidence of VD.

--Investigators looking into the Gulf War Syndrome found that all 695,000 troops in the Persian Gulf War were involuntarily administered the unproven, experimental toxicity-enhancer, Pyridostigmine Bromide (PB) supposedly as a nerve agent pre-treatment medication. Officials estimated that approximately two-thirds of those troops took the drug for varying periods of time. However, DoD scientists who studied Pyridostigmine and nerve agent Sarin concluded that PB should be used only when the threat is nerve agent Soman; Pyridostigmine pre-treatment unfortunately makes individuals MORE vulnerable to Sarin. Defense intelligence knew before the war that Iraq did not manufacture, stockpile, or use Soman; just one Iraqi chemical plant was estimated to produce up to TWO TONS of Sarin per day, however. (One lethal dose of Sarin fits on the head of a pin.)


--Chlorine Gas and chlorine-bearing Mustard gas were feared in Europe in World War I, and they are still currently in the chemical-warfare arsenal of many countries. Chlorine gas was reportedly released in Iraq during the Gulf War.

--Chlorine is widely added to U.S. drinking water today for the sole purpose of killing something, while natural water oxygenation treatments as used in Europe are much more safe for human consumption. (Chlorine can be removed with a common carbon filter, but fluorine cannot.)


--Fluorine is the most highly-reactive and chemically unstable of ALL existing chemical elements. Fluorine is not found by itself in nature, because it is so unstable that it chemically combines--violently, in many cases--with practically any other element.

--Fluorine has the strongest effect of all the halogens. Fluorine is one of the major ingredients in the psycho-active psychiatric drug PROZAC (Fluoxetene Hydrochloride) and also in deadly Sarin military nerve gas (Isopropyl-Methyl-Phosphoryl Fluoride). According to an EPA report (included herein), once you remove the fluorine from Sarin, all that remains is a non-toxic acid. The nerve-gas Soman is chemically similar to Sarin; they both contain fluorine. They are called "nerve" agents because they directly attack and destroy the nervous system in a very efficient manner.

--The infamous date-rape hypnotic drug "Roofs" (Rohypnol) is fluorinated Valium, which is reportedly 20-30 times more potent than Valium alone.

--Fluorine is widely added to drinking water today strictly as mass-medication, supposedly to help the teeth of children under 14 years of age. In spite of the initially-advertised purpose of "helping the teeth of children under 14", it's remarkable to find that our military bases were among the first drinking water supplies to be involuntarily fluoridated, over 40 years ago. Over 60% of the U.S. fresh water supplies are currently fluoridated, and according to pro-fluoride promotional literature, current plans are to increase this to over 90% within just a few years.

--Note the following entry in an EPA/NIOSH (Environmental Protection Agency/National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health) Hazardous Waste book, on page 3066 under SODIUM FLUORIDE:

"An experimental tumorigen and teratogen [meaning it's a common tool normally used to deliberately and predictably cause cancer tumors and monstrous abnormalities in laboratory experiments]. Human system overdose effects: Burning, prickling, tingling, itching of the skin, drooping of the eyelid, tremors, extra fluid intake, muscle weakness, headache, EKG [brainwave] changes, cyanosis [bluish skin color from inadequate oxygen], respiratory depression, hypermotility [extremely physically active], diarrhea, nausea or vomiting, salivary gland changes, changes in teeth and supporting structures, musculo-skeletal changes, increased immune system response, and human mutatogenic data [mutates human cells]. A corrosive irritant to eyes and mucous membranes. Experimental reproductive effects. It is very phytotoxic [toxic to plant life]. Used in chemical cleaning, for fluoridation of drinking water, as a fungicide and insecticide. ... May be a carcinogen."

--On page 1735 in the same book, under FLUORIDES: "Can cause or aggravate attacks of asthma and severe bone changes, making normal movements painful. Some signs of pulmonary fibrosis are noted. Some enzyme systems effects are reported. Loss of weight, anorexia [loss of appetite], anemia, wasting and cachexia [general wasting of the body during a chronic disease], and dental defects are among the common findings in chronic fluoride poisoning. Symptoms of intoxication include gastric, intestinal, circulatory, respiratory and nervous complaints and skin rashes."

That's the official US government EPA's scientific viewpoint on Fluoride as a hazardous waste.


FLUORIDE is the common name for a combination of the chemical element Fluorine with some other substance. A major source of fluoride is that it is a hazardous-waste by-product from the manufacture of aluminum. Aluminum companies reportedly had "mountains" of the stuff in the 1940's that they didn't know what to do with, and it was becoming a seriously expensive problem for hazardous-waste disposal.

Advertisements by Alcoa Aluminum recommending that we add sodium fluoride to our drinking water can be found in old periodicals dated long BEFORE fluoridation was officially approved by the authorities. Fluoride promoter Oscar Ewing, head of the Federal Security Agency (FSA) which was once senior to the U.S. Public Health Service in the early 1950's, left the employ of Alcoa Aluminum not long before he headed up the U.S. fluoridation campaign. (Follow the money)

Fluoride is a common major ingredient in anesthetics, hypnotics, psychiatric drugs, highly toxic rat and cockroach poisons, and several types of deadly military nerve gas. It is also added to U.S. drinking water.

Toxic sodium fluoride and its more toxic fluorinated cousins like potassium fluoride have historically been quite expensive to properly and safely dispose of, until around 1950 when some industries with an overabundance of this toxic hazardous waste actually convinced the public on the terrifically insane but highly profitable idea of selling it to the public at a 20,000% markup, injecting it into our fresh water supply, and then DRINKING it.

Yes, a 20,000% markup: Fluoride--intended originally for human consumption only by children under 14 years of age--is injected into our drinking water supply at approx. 1 part-per-million (ppm), but since humans only drink approximately 1/2 of one percent of the total water supply, the rest literally goes down the drains as a free hazardous-waste disposal site for the chemical industry, where instead of penalizing them, we PAY them for the "privilege" of dumping their expensive hazardous wastes directly down our sewers, with no environmental liabilities. How many salesmen dream of such a deal? (Follow the money.)

Independent scientific evidence over the past 50 years reveals that fluoride allegedly shortens our life span, promotes cancer and various mental disturbances, accelerates osteoporosis and broken hips in old folks, and makes us stupid, docile, and subservient, all in one package.

Fluorine has an affinity for calcium, so the most common form of fluorine in nature is Calcium Fluoride, commonly called Fluor-spar. Fluor-spar is relatively stable, and thus is far less toxic than the man-made toxic-waste derivations of fluorine. However, even calcium fluoride causes adverse reactions in humans.

Take India, for example. Due to the fact that millions of people in India are afflicted with fluorosis (excessive fluoride disease) such as malformed spine, neck and pelvis, weakened tooth structure and mottled or discolored teeth, there have been much more thorough scientific studies performed in India on fluoride, than in the West.

In an extensive government-sponsored study Dr. A.K. Susheela of the India Institute of Medical Sciences in New Delhi, found that (contrary to American Dental Association literature) fluoride severely disrupts the formation of the bone matrix, thereby inhibiting the proper hardening of bones.

Dr. Susheela's work was so stunning and so conclusive that in 1986 it prompted the Indian government to authorize the construction of defluoridation plants for their drinking water. The top-priority for India's defluoridation campaign is pregnant women and young breast-fed children. The studies conclusively showed that high levels of fluoride in drinking water are clearly associated with birth defects, stillbirths, and early infant mortality.

Dr. Susheela developed a blood test which enables early detection of fluoride toxicity before bone and teeth disorders became irreversible.

India's responsible research on fluoride toxicity is a properly ethical, up-to-date scientific model, which contrasts strongly with irresponsible and authoritarian fluoridation policy in the West which is based on unethical, low scientific standards and high political opinion. Our major policy decisions were demonstrably influenced by nothing more than emotionally-charged debate where an "expert" dentist endorses an "expert" doctor who refers to "thousands of fluoride dental studies" in a closed loop like a snake swallowing its own tail. Meanwhile neither of them has done their real homework on the subject or they would find that the "thousands of studies" refuting fluoride harm FACTUALLY DO NOT EXIST.

$20,000 REWARD FOR ANY PROOF THAT FLUORIDE WORKS. Dr. Robert Mick, DDS, was one of the original scientists who promoted fluoridation, until he did his own animal studies on sodium fluoride in the late 1940's. Authorities ordered him to cover up his test results, and he refused. He then proceeded to do some more research on those very authorities and their motives for covering up his data.

Dr. Mick's studies prompted him to confidently present this challenge: "$20,000 to the first individual who can provide just ONE copy of any controlled experiment with any of the U.S. Public Health Service (USPHS) recommended fluorides in water, at the USPHS recommended parts-per-million, which shows that poisonous fluorides are safe and will cause no future body harm."

Dr. Mick's $20,000 offer has been valid since the 1950's, but per a 1991 radio interview, Dr. Mick said that nobody had yet presented even one claim to him in hopes of collecting the reward. His address is 916 Stone Road, Laurel Springs, New Jersey. He put his money where his mouth is, with no challengers for 40 years.


There are reports of aluminum in the brain possibly being a causative factor in Alzheimer's Disease. Evidence points towards fluoride's strong affinity for aluminum and also its ability to "trick" the blood-brain barrier by looking like the hydrogen ion, and thus allowing an easy chemical access to brain tissue.

Evidently Alzheimer's Disease didn't exist, until after people started using aluminum cookware. Isabel Jansen, R.N., wrote of a simple experiment regarding the use of aluminum pots, where you can easily prove for yourself that both the aluminum and the fluoride content in water both increase dramatically, when combined: "In January 1987, experiments performed at the Medical Research Endocrinology Dept., Newcastle upon Tyne, England, and the Physics Dept of the Univ. of Ruhana, Sri Lanka, showed that fluoridated water at 1 ppm, when used in cooking in aluminum cookware, concentrated the aluminum up to 600 ppm, whereas water without fluoride did not. (Science News, 131:73) (Note: Why wasn't this simple test ever financed, done, and published in U.S. scientific papers?)

"The researchers suggested that because of the known fact that aluminum is neuro-toxic and is in abnormally high concentrations in the brain of Alzheimer's and other neurological disease victims, including AIDS, that these findings raise questions about adding fluoride to the water supply of communities to reduce tooth decay.

"Because of these findings, a test was made of Antigo, Wisconsin water which had been fluoridated for 33 years. The water was examined by a certified Wisconsin laboratory, and showed that when it was used in cooking in aluminum cookware, it concentrated the aluminum by 833 times and increased the fluoride content by 100%.

"The maximum allowed aluminum content of water is set by the World Health Organization at 200 micrograms per liter. This makes Antigo water, when cooked in aluminum, 75 times over the maximum. No test was made of distilled water, as the Antigo Water Dept. does not dispense distilled water. Antigo water pipes are also encrusted with (calcified) fluoride from 26 to 3,100 ppm. This latter was analyzed and diagnosed by the Wisconsin Dept of Hygiene as being aluminum fluoride. Regardless of which findings are true, to chance exchanging a hole in a tooth---which can be repaired at a nominal fee---for dementia (organic brain disorder) in later years, for which there is no remedy at any price, hardly seems to be a good bargain.

"Therefore, it would seem imperative that other communities test their water in the same manner to see if it produces the same results, as tests may vary depending on the mineral variations of the water and the type of aluminum cookware. This simple test can be done by anyone, with the help of a laboratory to do the analysis." ISABEL JANSEN, R.N. (Journal of the National Academy of Research Biochemists - Jan/Feb '90)

Legitimate scientists who have repeatedly attempted to blow the whistle on the mega-bucks fluoride PR scam have consistently been given a very unscientific Black-PR treatment, and thus their valid facts disputing the current vested interests never arrived in the press. (Follow the money.)


In 1952 a slick PR campaign was initiated, headed by Oscar Ewing who was once an Alcoa Aluminum attorney, and spurred on by a dentist named Bull. This campaign ramrodded the concept of water fluoridation through our national Public Health departments and various national and local dental organizations. The campaign was better described as a highly-emotional "beer-salesman's convention" instead of the objective scientific experiment which it should properly have been. The subject of water fluoridation has continued in that same emotional, unscientific manner right up to present time.

To illustrate the emotional vs. the scientific nature of this issue, just take an honest, objective look at the response given by people when the subject of fluoridation comes up. By all means, ask your dentist. Ask yourself honestly, "Is this response UNBIASED AND OPENLY-INTERESTED SCIENTIFIC OBJECTIVITY, or is it PREJUDICED EMOTIONAL BLUSTER?"


There is a tremendous amount of emotionally subjective opinion attached to fluoridation. Ask an MD about the possible toxic effects of fluoride, and (instead of correctly referring you to a toxicologist) he'll respond that he trusts his dental colleagues who say that fluoride is not toxic. Ask a dentist, and he'll respond that he trusts the ADA and whatever he was told in dental school (where the pharmaceutical industry, incidentally, has a very strong influence). Both have convincing answers which whitewash this toxic hazardous waste and almost make it sound as if it is a vitamin or a nutrient. Keep in mind, however, that those opinions are only OPINIONS, from vested-interest individuals who receive a VERY GOOD standard of living that is strictly dependent upon the illness of others. Rat poison is not a vitamin, and it never will be.

In general, doctors and dentists have a good heart, but even they cannot deny that their professional training since their first day in school, was strongly influenced by a huge pharmaceutical interest which endorses giving them attractive kick-back benefits and vacations etc. in exchange for their referrals to expensive drug prescriptions and medical procedures. Seen from the standpoint of the pharmaceutical industry, it's quite handy and profitable to have virtually ALL doctors and dentists voluntarily standing up for them and being their well-paid professional "agents" in the community at large. They don't even have to PAY their pushers, because the "victims" do! The main visibility the vested-interests have is their non-stop multi-million-dollar drug commercials and ads which they hammer the unsuspecting public with, day and night.

The treatment of sickness with all the aspects of expensive pharmaceutical drugs and/or surgery, can be a highly profitable and sometimes unethical business. In the United States alone, it's a published fact that there are twice as many people (legally) killed by unnecessary medical procedures EACH YEAR, than were killed in the entire Viet Nam war. That is unethical by any definition.

However, it's only business, and due to the extreme profits at stake, the thriving medical-dental-pharmaceutical business has been carefully planned out by the best legal and business advisers that money can buy. Thus it's predictable that the loudest complaints against truthful exposure will come from those who continually receive a high income from sickness, be they an individual practitioner, a huge worldwide pharmaceutical company that's larger than some Third World countries, or anyone in between. The righteously-indignant complaints and actions are strongest when someone threatens their present and future bank accounts. It's historically been hugely profitable to suppress the opposition with various dirty tricks, including but not limited to slander, libel and defamation of character.

Who has the most potential for damaging those bank accounts? Anyone who gets between them and the public, and especially in their most profitable areas. Thus a common pattern of suppression has occurred towards certain truly independent (unattached to, and not financed or influenced by any vested-interest company or group) scientific professionals who use valid research to discover and publish some true PRIMARY reasons for toxic poisoning sickness, and who thus provably prevent disease and/or help heal the public without drugs, surgery, rediation etc.

Such individuals have historically been a major threat to medical-dental-pharmaceutical profits. Many truly independent scientists/toxicologists who've spent a large portion of their lives studying, working with and publishing the various influences of toxins and poisons, have received a surprising amount of uncalled-for and unfair character assassination and other suppression.


There are reportedly more than 15 million Americans with diabetes. Since many diabetics drink more liquids than other people, then according to the Physicians Desk Reference these 15 million Americans probably shouldn't drink fluoridated water, because in doing so, they'll receive an excessive dose of fluoride, which is also accumulative in the body.

People with kidney disease also shouldn't drink fluoridated water. Kidney disease, by definition, lowers the efficiency of the kidneys, which is your main route of fluoride elimination. Cases are on record (Annapolis, Maryland, 1979) where kidney-disease patients on dialysis machines died, due to a fluoride overdose in the city water supply.

There is no data as to what effects "standard" fluoridated water causes to kidney patients on dialysis, but the entire premise is stupidly ridiculous: Could you find any kidney patient volunteers to do a meaningful scientific double-blind crossover study on how many parts-per-million of rat poison in the city water supply it takes to be lethal for someone on dialysis?

If fluoride gets into their body in higher doses, then how much of their lifestyle, physical health, mental attitude, etc. is lowered by dialysis using city water, only because they're hammered with a higher dose of rat poison than the general public is, and not because of their kidney disease as might be mis-diagnosed?


The first occurrence of fluoridated drinking water was found in Germany's Nazi prison camps, which were maintained partly by I.G. Farben. The Gestapo had little concern about fluoride's supposed effect on children's teeth; their alleged reason for mass-medicating water with sodium fluoride was to sterilize humans and force them into calm submission. (Ref. book: "The Crime and Punishment of I.G. Farben" by Joseph Borkin.)

I.G. FARBEN DEVELOPED FLUORINATED SARIN AND SOMAN NERVE GAS: The name "SARIN" is an acronym of the names of the four key I.G. Farben employees involved in its initial chemical formulation and production: Schrader, Ambros, Rudriger, and Van Der Linde. Otto Ambros was the production chief of I.G. Farben's poison gas facilities in Germany. (See Ambros' photo on p. 286 of "World Without Cancer" by G. Edward Griffin.)

Sarin was developed to replace deadly Malathion and Zyklon B nerve gases, specifically with the intent to exterminate millions of prisoners. Fluoride-bearing Sarin was reportedly so strong, "it made Zyklon B look like underarm deodorant." (The Dickinson Statement, "Health Consciousness", October 1988)


The following letter was received by the Lee Foundation for Nutritional Research, Milwaukee Wisconsin, on 2 October 1954, from Mr. Charles Perkins, a chemist:

"I have your letter of September 29 asking for further documentation regarding a statement made in my book, The Truth About Water Fluoridation, to the effect that the idea of water fluoridation was brought to England from Russia by the Russian Communist Kreminoff.

"In the 1930's, Hitler and the German Nazi's envisioned a world to be dominated and controlled by a Nazi philosophy of pan-Germanism. The German chemists worked out a very ingenious and far-reaching plan of mass-control which was submitted to and adopted by the German General Staff. This plan was to control the population in any given area through mass medication of drinking water supplies. By this method they could control the population in whole areas, reduce population by water medication that would produce sterility in women, and so on. In this scheme of mass-control, sodium fluoride occupied a prominent place. ...

"Repeated doses of infinitesimal amounts of fluoride will in time reduce an individual's power to resist domination, by slowly poisoning and narcotizing a certain area of the brain, thus making him submissive to the will of those who wish to govern him. [A convenient invisible lobotomy?]

"The real reason behind water fluoridation is not to benefit children's teeth. If this were the real reason there are many ways in which it could be done that are much easier, cheaper, and far more effective. The real purpose behind water fluoridation is to reduce the resistance of the masses to domination and control and loss of liberty.

"When the Nazis under Hitler decided to go into Poland, both the German General Staff and the Russian General Staff exchanged scientific and military ideas, plans, and personnel, and the scheme of mass control through water medication was seized upon by the Russian Communists because it fitted ideally into their plan to communize the world. ...

"I was told of this entire scheme by a German chemist who was an official of the great Farben chemical industries and was also prominent in the Nazi movement at the time. I say this with all the earnestness and sincerity of a scientist who has spent nearly 20 years' research into the chemistry, biochemistry, physiology and pathology of fluorine--any person who drinks artificially fluorinated water for a period of one year or more will never again be the same person mentally or physically." CHARLES E. PERKINS, Chemist, 2 October 1954.

Quoting Einstein's nephew, Dr. E.H. Bronner (a chemist who had also been a prisoner of war during WWII) in a letter printed in The Catholic Mirror, Springfield, MA, January 1952:

"It appears that the citizens of Massachusetts are among the 'next' on the agenda of the water poisoners.

"There is a sinister network of subversive agents, Godless 'intellectual' parasites, working in our country today whose ramifications grow more extensive, more successful and more alarming each new year and whose true objective is to demoralize, paralyze and destroy our great Republic--from within if they can, according to their plan--for their own possession.

"The tragic success they have already attained in their long siege to destroy the moral fiber of American life is now one of their most potent footholds towards their own ultimate victory over us.

"Fluoridation of our community water systems can well become their most subtle weapon for our sure physical and mental deterioration. ...

"As a research chemist of established standing, I built within the past 22 years, 3 American chemical plants and licensed 6 of my 53 patents. Based on my years of practical experience in the health-food and chemical field, let me warn: fluoridation of drinking water is criminal insanity, sure national suicide. Don't do it.

"Even in small quantities, sodium fluoride is a deadly poison to which no effective antidote has been found. Every exterminator knows that it is the most efficient rat-killer. ... Sodium fluoride is entirely different from organic calcium-fluoro-phosphate needed by our bodies and provided by nature, in God's great providence and love, to build and strengthen our bones and our teeth. This organic calcium-fluoro-phosphate, derived from proper foods, is an edible organic salt, insoluble in water and assimilable by the human body, whereas the non-organic sodium fluoride used in fluoridating water is instant poison to the body and fully water soluble. The body refuses to assimilate it.

"Careful, bonafide laboratory experimentation by conscientious, patriotic research chemists, and actual medical experience, have both revealed that instead of preserving or promoting 'dental health,' fluoridated drinking water destroys teeth, before adulthood and after, by the destructive mottling and other pathological conditions it actually causes in them, and also creates many other very grave pathological conditions in the internal organisms of bodies consuming it. How can it be called a "health" plan? What's behind it?

"That any so-called "doctors" would persuade a civilized nation to add voluntarily a deadly poison to its drinking water systems is unbelievable. It is the height of criminal insanity.

"No wonder Hitler and Stalin fully believed and agreed from 1939 to 1941 that, quoting from both Lenin's Last Will and Hitler's Mein Kampf: "America we shall demoralize, divide, and destroy from within." ...

"Are our Civil Defense organizations and agencies awake to the perils of water poisoning by fluoridation? Its use has been recorded in other countries. Sodium fluoride water solutions are the cheapest and most effective rat killers known to chemists: colorless, odorless, tasteless; no antidote, no remedy, no hope: Instant and complete extermination of rats. ...

"Fluoridation of water systems can be slow national suicide, or quick national liquidation. It is criminal insanity--treason!" Dr. E.H. Bronner, Mfg. Research Chemist, Los Angeles.


"I, Oliver Kenneth Goff, was a member of the Communist Party and the Young Communist League, from May 2, 1936, to October 9, 1939. During this period of time, I operated under the alias of John Keats with number 18-B-2. My testimony before the Government is in Volume 9 of the Un-American Activities Report for 1939.

"While a member of the Communist Party, I attended Communist training schools in New York and Wisconsin ... and we were trained in the revolutionary overthrow of the U.S. Government.

"... We discussed quite thoroughly the fluoridation of water supplies and how we were using it in Russia as a tranquilizer in the prison camps. The leaders of our school felt that if it could be induced into the American water supply, it would bring about a spirit of lethargy in the nation, where it could keep the general public docile during a steady encroachment of Communism. We also discussed the fact that keeping a store of deadly fluoride near the water reservoir would be advantageous during the time of the revolution, as it would give us opportunity to dump this poison into the water supply and either kill off the populace or threaten them with liquidation, so that they would surrender to obtain fresh water.

"We discussed in these schools, the complete art of revolution: the seizure of the main utilities, such as light, power, gas, and water, but it was felt by the leadership that if a program of fluoridating of the water could be carried out in the nation, it would go a long way toward the advancement of the revolution. "The above statements are true." Oliver Kenneth Goff.

(Signed & notarized 6/22/57.)

20 years after Mr. Goff was indoctrinated on the Communist purposes of fluoridating U.S. water supplies, in New York there appeared an article in the 13 April 1956 issue of THE COMMUNIST DAILY WORKER entitled "Facts Spur Campaign for Fluoridation Here":

"Politicians of the [New York] City Council and Board of Estimate are timid men who are catering to misguided sentiment, outmoded tradition, and backward fears of the unscientific. A widespread educational campaign among both the politicians and people on the value of the Board of Health's program for fluoridation is certainly indicated."

Just for practice, read the above aloud to a friend, and you'll figure out for yourself if the Communists were just humanely concerned with the dental health of American children in 1956. (Remember, the dental health of children under 14 years old has always been the ONLY official reason to fluoridate our water. It was only supposed to work on teeth that were still soft and growing, and not adults.)

Note that the DAILY WORKER commonly gave widespread advice to all Communists in America, and note also that the Communists were our enemy in 1956. The above article openly promoted fluoridation of US water supplies, with official Party line instructions on how to stigmatize people who opposed fluoridation as being "misguided", "outmoded", "backward", and "unscientific." What's startling is that in the 1990's, those same words appear in current ADA promotional literature on how to handle opponents to the fluoridation program, almost word-for-word.


Russia's use of sodium fluoride during World War II was entered into the Congressional Record in the early 1950's. USAF Major George R. Jordan testified before Un-American Activity committees of Congress that he had been stationed in Great Falls, Montana during the war as a U.S.-Soviet liaison officer.

Major Jordan stated that one of his tasks had been to procure "vast quantities" of sodium fluoride for shipment to Siberia via numerous Lend-Lease airplanes which we were sending to Russia from Montana, via Canada and Alaska. (7,926 airplanes were sent to Russia via this route.) Major Jordan testified that the Russians openly admitted to "... using the fluoride in the water supplies in their concentration camps, to make the prisoners stupid, docile, and subservient."

Of related interest, regarding "follow the money": In his book, "From Major Jordan's Diaries" (Doubleday & Co, 1952), Racey Jordan also gives dates and shipment numbers of our generous Lend-Lease program's many shipments of secret U.S. documents and ATOMIC MATERIALS, including a whopping 1,200 POUNDS of CONCENTRATED URANIUM ORE in 1943, to Stalin via the Lend-Lease airplanes and ships which we freely gave to Russia, thanks to Harry Hopkins who headed the Lend-Lease Program and who had an office in Roosevelt's White House. It should have been no surprise to the Americans when the Russians detonated their first atomic bomb test in 1947, but few Americans knew that our generous donation of nuclear information and raw materials to the Soviets, started in 1943.

How expensive is uranium? July 23, 1994: The Austin Texas American Statesman ran an article describing how Istanbul, Turkey police had recently seized 22 pounds of uranium, believed to have been smuggled from a former Soviet republic. The estimated value of those 22 pounds of uranium was $825 million. Given the above value, what was the estimated value of the 1,200 pounds of concentrated uranium ore that our Lend-Lease program freely gave to Stalin in 1943?

History tells us that this supremely treasonous act was a major long-term cause of the tremendously expensive but highly profitable cold war that changed our national debt graph into an exponential curve.

Quoting a State Department report dated June 1944, prepared by our USSR Ambassador Averell Harriman, "Stalin paid tribute to the assistance rendered by the United States to Soviet industry before and during the war. He said that about two-thirds of all large industrial enterprise in the Soviet Union had been built with United States help or technical assistance." (Following the money, Averill Harriman was also the head of Brown Brother Harriman Bank, the largest privately-held bank in the world. The record shows that both Harriman and his Managing Director Prescott Bush--George's dad--in the early 1930's had been instrumental in financing Adolph Hitler, and also had strong financial connections with I.G. Farben. Details can be found in GEORGE BUSH: THE UNAUTHORIZED BIOGRAPHY, by Anton Chaitkin and Webster Tarpley.)


1952: The Delaney Committee 82nd Congress Hearings on Fluoride revealed that there was no actual scientific basis for the fluoridation of water supplies in the prevention of tooth decay. The recommendation of the Committee was for more research to be done before proceeding with this national mass medication. Their recommendation was totally ignored.

1953: In a joint speech, U.S. Surgeon-General Scheele, and Health, Education & Welfare Undersecretary Nelson Rockefeller announced hopeful plans to put more medicine than just fluoride into the U.S. water supplies:

"Dr. Scheele, in discussing mass-application methods for preventing non-infectious diseases, said a case in point was fluoridation of water supplies to reduce tooth decay. Nearly 800 cities throughout the country have adopted the technique during the past 10 years, he said. Such a community-wide attack on "far more serious diseases than dental decay" probably will be forthcoming after laboratory tests have paved the way, he predicted." (Paterson Evening News, 11/6/53)

Scheele stated "during the past 10 years" just as a misleading PR statement. He could just as well have said the past 100 years. It was only during the prior 3 years that all of those cities were fluoridated, not 10 years. Just two cities had been fluoridated for 10 years, and not 800 as stated. This covered up the fact that there were no valid long-term scientific studies then, and today there still are no long-term studies.

1950's comment by Edward L. Bernays, nephew of Sigmund Freud and PR man for the fluoridation project under Oscar Ewing: "... the most direct way to reach the mind of the HERD is through the leaders. ... Public Health Officers cannot afford the professional modesty professed by physicians. A redefinition of ethics is necessary.... and the subject matter of the propaganda need not necessarily be true." (Book: Crystallizing Public Opinion, by E. L. Bernays.)


The first available ADA Journal entry on fluoride was in 1936. Here are a few quotes from that issue (#23, pages 569-570, 1936):

Fluorine is not an essential nutrient:

"Studies by Sharpless and McCollum (Sharpless, G.R. and McCollom, E.V.: Journal of Nutrition, 6:163 March 1933) furnish information regarding the biological role of fluorine. They found that young rats (aged from 16 to 18 days) contain little, if any, fluorine, whereas, adult rats have considerable fluorine in the bones and teeth, the amount varying with the diet fed, and increasing with age."

"By feeding rats an experimental diet in which care was taken to keep the fluorine content at a minimum, the following observations were made: Reproduction was unaffected; the fluorine content of the bones could be "reduced to between 6 and 25 ppm, and could be eliminated from the teeth, without showing any gross deleterious effect" and no change was produced in the calcium to phosphorus ratio in the bones. This evidence supports the idea that fluorine plays no important useful biologic role."

"On the contrary, there is an increasing volume of evidence of the injurious effects of fluorine, especially the chronic intoxication resulting from the ingestion of minute amounts of fluorine over long periods of time. The studies conducted by Dr. Smith and her co-workers at the Univ. of Arizona have shown that 1 ppm, and possibly .8 PPM of fluorine will produce definite signs of enamel dystrophy in children born and reared in an endemic [peculiar to a people or nation] area."

"Such data enable us to calculate the approximate dosage of fluorine per unit of body weight per day, capable of producing a definite degree of tooth injury in the majority of children. During the first six years of life, the body weight ranges from approximately 7 pounds at birth to about 40 pounds at the age of 6. The average weight during this period is about 25 pounds, or 12 kg. If it is assumed that the average daily water intake is 1 quart, or 1 liter, a fluorine content of .8 PPM would mean a lifetime fluorine intake of .8 milligrams per day, which for 12 kg. of body weight would be .07 mg. per day, per kilogram of body weight." [Note: Actual intake in the 1990's is twice that amount.]"

"It is interesting to compare this value for the injurious fluorine dosage, with the values that have been determined experimentally for lead and arsenic in the white rat. Lead acetate added to the food will check the growth and appetite of the white rat, when a dosage of from .7 micrograms to 150 micrograms per day per kilogram of body weight is administered. This wide dosage range is due to variation in susceptibility of the rats and to variation in the severity of the symptoms. Addition of arsenic trioxide to the food causes loss of body weight in the white rat when the dosage is from 1.5 to 5 micrograms per kilogram of body weight per day. Such a comparison of toxicity data suggests that fluorine, lead and arsenic belong to the same group, as far as ability to cause some symptom of toxicity in minute dosage is concerned. Thus far, the ability of fluorine to induce chronic intoxication when administered in minute amounts over long periods of time has been considered."

"Let us now pass on to the general actions of fluorine and its action on bones and teeth. Fluorine, a general protoplasmic poison, exerts a strong inhibitory action on many enzymes. The more complex inorganic compounds containing fluorine are frequently toxic because of a direct action of the compound itself, or because of a conversion of the complex compound, as by hydrolysis [changing by taking up the elements of water], into simpler compounds, such as the simpler fluorides."

"Similarly, many organic compounds containing fluorine are toxic because of a liberation of fluorine in the presence of protoplasm [the substance--fluids, cells, etc.--that is the physical basis of life]. Moreover, even in the absence of such disintegration of the organic molecule with liberation of fluorine, the presence of fluorine in the molecule often enhances the toxicity of an organic compound. It has been shown by Lehmann (Lehmann, F.: Arch f. Exper. Path. u. Pharmakol., 130:250, 1928) that the introduction of fluorine into the side chain of aromatic compounds, such as toluene and m-toluidine, increased the toxicity to frogs. The toxic effect of fluorine compounds on yeast has been studied by Effront (Effront, J.: 1892, Jrnl Chem. Society, A. 1532, 1891; A. 905, 1892; A. II, 425, 1894.) and by Arthus and Gavelle. (Arthus and Gavelle: Compt. Rend. Society de Biol., 55:1481, 1903)"

--That wasn't the end of the ADA Journal reference, but you get the idea. In spite of such valid early studies reported in the ADA Journal, the ADA and USPHS scientific opinion was later regulated more by lobbyists than by scientists, on the fluoride issue. Their literature of today emphatically indicates that as long as your teeth are free of cavities, the longevity of the rest of your body is not open for discussion. The carefully-biased literature repeatedly and exclusively hammers the dental benefit point, meanwhile carefully avoiding references to any bodily toxic load.

There are only several hundred registered toxicologists in the entire country. The subject of fluoride is actually the home territory of toxicologists rather than dentists or doctors, but note that the fluoride promoters never use toxicologists as a reference because toxicologists (who are bright enough to know that God isn't stupid, and who have seen what rat poison actually does to rats, and who are quite independent) are almost uniformly against fluoridation.


An often-quoted study in favor of water-fluoridation was done in the late 1930's in Hereford, Texas, once billed as "The Town Without Cavities", but there are flaws:

1. Hereford has a high level of naturally-occurring calcium fluoride in the water, not sodium fluoride.

2. According to a letter from Dr. George Heard, the dentist in Hereford, TX who initially promoted Hereford s lack of dental cavities to the dental profession, even the naturally-occurring calcium fluoride in the water supply in Hereford was damaging to people's teeth. After many years of dental practice and observation of dental patients in Hereford, he concluded that fluoride was not beneficial. Here is a 1954 letter from Dr. Heard:

"Hereford, Texas has been called the TOWN WITHOUT A TOOTH ACHE. This is not true. But the phrase has been used effectively by the people interested in marketing SODIUM FLUORIDE all over the country. ...I believe that fluorine does in a mild way, retard cavities, but I also believe that the damage it does is far greater than any good it may appear to accomplish. It even makes the teeth so brittle and crumbly they can be treated only with difficulty, if at all. "The dental investigators who came to our county some fifteen years ago did, in my opinion, make a serious mistake when they gave to fluorine the credit for our good teeth, and overlooked the quality of food grown in our rich, well mineralized soil. Every person I found who had no dental caries, consumed much milk. Why use a poison, when correct food will maintain our bodies free from diseases and tooth decay? It is hellish and non-American to put poison in city water supplies and force citizens to drink it. George W. Heard, DDS, 15 March 1954."


In 1938, Dr. Gerald Cox, a research fellow of the Mellon Institute, picked up the fluoride ball and began publicly promoting the addition of sodium fluoride to public water systems, claiming that it would reduce tooth decay. The Mellons owned Alcoa, the Aluminum Company of America, who stockpiled quantities of sodium fluoride as a hazardous waste. Two major obstacles to Mr. Cox promotional campaign were the AMA and the ADA, whose initial position was that fluoride was strictly a poison and that it shouldn't be introduced into the public water supply as a mass-medication. (Reference: AMA Journal, 9/18/43 and ADA Journal, 10/1/44)

Despite the initial warnings from the AMA and ADA, Dr. Cox enlisted the help of a Wisconsin dentist, Dr. J.J. Fritsch, to promote fluoridation of drinking water, and in early 1945 Grand Rapids, Michigan was the first to fall for their story and fluoridate its water supply. In his crusade Dr. Fritsch enlisted the support of P.R. man, Dr. Frank Bull, the Wisconsin State Dental Health Officer, who organized political campaigns in order to persuade local officials to approve fluoridation. They applied constant lobbying pressure on both the ADA and the U.S. Public Health Service (USPHS). Dr. Fritsch was reportedly a "non-stop fanatic" on fluoridation. (Fluoridation the Great Dilemma, Waldbott, p.258)

In 1945 both Grand Rapids, Michigan and Newburgh, New York were artificially fluoridated with sodium fluoride in their drinking water supply as an experimental procedure to see if fluoride actually would improve dental health. According to testimony of a 1952 Congressional Hearing on Fluoride, the officials in charge of this "experiment" admitted that they hadn't really had prior knowledge of artificial fluoridation with sodium fluoride (versus naturally-occurring calcium fluoride), if it would actually work, nor what side effects it would cause, because the standard scientific laboratory method of first fully testing with animals had been ignored and bypassed in this case of sodium fluoride. (82nd Congress, 2nd Session, Report #2500 - 1952 - House Select Committee)

The researchers' only prior knowledge was admittedly based upon observations that in areas containing natural calcium fluoride (fluor-spar) in the water, such as in parts of Texas and Colorado, tooth decay appeared to be less prevalent. (No allowance was made for excellent nutrition in these opinions.) There were no prior studies made with the highly toxic sodium fluoride, which was actually what they used for fluoridation.

Note that an "optimum" level of 1 PPM of natural calcium fluoride in water was what they studied in Texas and Colorado, yet they then dosed our drinking water with 1ppm of the 20-times more toxic hazardous-waste sodium fluoride, openly claiming that equal concentrations of each had exactly the same effect on human health. Thus even their starting premise was apples-versus-oranges.

The 1 PPM value was just picked at random because there were no tests or studies showing exactly what was the "optimum" and because people only supposedly drank one liter of water per day, and 1 milligram was a proper daily dose for normal people with normal kidney function. (It turns out that our actual average daily intake of fluoride is 2 mg, however.) During the 1952 Delaney Committee Congressional Hearings, scientists expressed concern that the dosage was much too high, especially for children or people with diabetes or kidney disease.

Speculation was that before risking millions of lives in Grand Rapids and Newburgh, artificial fluoridation with sodium fluoride was first secretly tested on the population of U.S. prisons and/or military bases, to see if 1 PPM would actually kill or injure anyone. (A Freedom of Information Act research project?)

The Grand Rapids/Newburgh experimental study was originally set up with the intention to last for a full 10 years, after which a proper scientific evaluation of the collected data would have enabled a proper, safe decision to be made regarding fluoridation of the rest of America's drinking water.

However, the U.S. Public Health Service suddenly changed their minds. In 1950, after only 5 years, it was discovered that while the cavity rates had indeed gone down in Grand Rapids, cavity rates had also gone down at a comparable rate in Muskegon, its control city, supposedly because people were becoming more hygiene-conscious. Muskegon was then promptly fluoridated to cover up the discrepancy, and the Grand Rapids fluoridation project was advertised as an unqualified success. (Fluoride the Aging Factor, P.104)


Article from the Royal Oak Tribune, 1/21/59: "FLUORIDATION IS TOP SECRET Lansing (AP) -- Seven more Michigan communities started fluoridating their water last year, the state health department reported today. But the names of the communities are "top secret" as far as the department is concerned. 'We made a policy of not giving out the names of those adding fluoride, a couple of years ago,' said Dr. Fred Wertheimer, director of the dentistry section. 'Local officials asked us not to make the announcements from here. Communities are so split on fluoridation that they said they would be barraged with letters and telephone calls from anti-fluoride people.'"


June 1965: Quote from Alfred Taylor, Ph.D, in a scientific letter appearing in the Oct. 2, 1965 issue of Saturday Review:

" ... My contact with fluoridation came about as a result of cancer research. In one project, various chemicals were added to the drinking water of mice susceptible to cancer in order to check the responsibility that some chemicals might delay the onset of the disease or prevent it altogether. Among the chemicals used in this research was sodium fluoride.

In the first two preliminary tests, the results obtained indicated that mice drinking fluoridated water tended to develop cancer at an earlier age as compared with control animals maintained on fluoride-free water. These earlier tests were followed by further investigations so that altogether, twelve experiments involving 645 mice were used in this research.

"The data indicated that drinking water with as little as 1 PPM shortened the life span of mice an average of nine per cent. This was true whether death was due to cancer or non-cancerous diseases. The only notice proponents of fluoridation gave to this work was to discredit it as much as possible. ... In experiments where the drug was added directly to suspensions of cancer tissue before inoculation into eggs or mice, sodium fluoride stimulated the growth of cancer tissue in concentrations of one part in more than 20 million. Scientists at Cambridge University (British Medical Journal, Oct 26, 1963) discovered that concentrations of sodium fluoride as low as one part in ten million inhibited the growth of a culture of human tissue. ... the growing weight of scientific evidence that water-borne fluorides, even at 1 ppm, have toxic possibilities must finally be recognized." ALFRED TAYLOR, Ph.D., Clayton Foundation, Biochemical Institute, University of Texas, Austin Texas, 1965.

Some years later Dr. Taylor stated, "The terrifying conclusion of the studies was that fluorine greatly induced a cancer tumor growth. If doctors and the public can be made aware of this catastrophe, fluoridation shall end quickly. It will someday be recognized as the most lethal and stupid "Health Program" ever conceived by the mind of man, witch doctors and blood-letters not excepted."


Keeping Dr. Taylor's findings and his above heartfelt plea in mind, how can the following be justified by any sane scientist:

According to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services publication "FLUORIDATION CENSUS 1985", which lists the current fluoridation levels of every fluoridated area in the United States, for the entire year of 1985 the U.S. Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) deliberately over-fluoridated four Alaskan village schools at the rate of 5 PARTS PER MILLION, instead of at the currently approved rate of 1 PPM. The schools were Unalaska, St. Michael, Shishmaref, and Stebbins. Why were these unsuspecting people being experimented upon? How can five parts-per-million (a whopping 20 milligrams per gallon of water) be justified?

The EPA lists fluoride as a "contaminant." The above intentional long-term 5 PPM overdose of innocent native schoolchildren occurred when the EPA's "Maximum Contaminant Level" (MCL) allowable for fluoride was just 2.4 parts per million. (In the early 1990's there was talk of having the EPA reduce the MCL of fluoride down to .4 PPM, due to recent studies that had connected fluoride with cancer.)

A challenge: Have an autonomous group of toxicologists with no special-interest axe to grind, do an honest, unbiased and thorough long-term scientific study of the residents of the above Alaskan towns. Also include a study of the residents of Hooper Bay, Alaska, where in May of 1992 a fluoride overdose severely poisoned 290 residents and killed Dominic Smith. Study what has happened to the above people since fluoride became part of their lives and include their previous and current dental and mental condition as part of the study, since that is, after all, why this entire situation began. It's well-known that Alaskan natives today have almost the worst dental health in the country, in spite of having been subjected to fluoridated water for over 30 years. (Incidentally, they practically live on candy and soda pop.)

--Which leads us to ask, just exactly what causes dental cavities? On the average, each American consumes 20-50 teaspoons of refined sugar each day. Using 40 teaspoons as an average, multiplying 40 teaspoons times approx. 250,000,000 people totals 10 billion teaspoons of sugar sold EACH DAY, just in the United States alone. That's very big business.


Vested interests who sell fluoride and pharmaceuticals, or who repair the damage, would have you believe that God screwed up so badly in engineering man's teeth that ALL of mankind is now born with a permanent deficiency of fluoride, and thus mass medication--with a nerve agent--is the most cost effective way to correct God's stupid error. However, the facts state differently. Regarding dental cavities, refined sugar and soda pop are two of the top contenders, whereas a sweeping lifetime-deficiency of rat poison and nerve agents in our bodies is one of the biggest, most blatant lies in all history.

Each year it's easy to find a school district science fair whereby a smart kid makes an experimental study of soaking various items (pennies, extracted teeth, etc.) in soda pop to see how long it takes to dissolve them. In one such experiment it took only 14 days for Pepsi Cola to dissolve the entire outer layer of enamel from a human tooth.

For the benefit of enlightening the U.S. Public Health Service, the ADA, the AMA, and the sugar and soda pop industries, try this complicated scientific experiment: Obtain a couple of extracted teeth, give just one of them a standard stannous fluoride treatment which supposedly proofs it against cavities, soak both of them in Coca-Cola or Pepsi--with a few teaspoons of sugar added--for a couple of weeks, daily changing the liquid and scrubbing the one tooth with fluoridated toothpaste, and then examine the two teeth. That should conclusively prove who is more stupid, God or the broad general public.

Since fluoridation was originally promoted as effective just for children under 14 years old, then the public health officials had a problem. How to justify mass-medicating adults with poisonous fluoride? One of the latest public health schemes along this line actually states that fluoride in saliva kills tooth plaque, emphasizing that the only way to get fluorine in your saliva is via drinking fluoridated water! Nothing is said of the toxic, life-shortening effects caused by having that much fluorine in your body, however. It not only kills plaque, but everything else in its path.

Is the object only to give you the brightest smile in the morgue?

An unexplored avenue of interest here is the chemical concoction inside a can of soda pop. Given the above statements about the corrosive action of soda pop, and also given the data on aluminum's probable relationship to Alzheimers disease, and also given the fact that soda pop is made with fluoridated water, and given the fact that poisons combine synergistically, usually in unpleasantly toxic ways, is there ANY guarantee whatsoever that your typical fluorinated can of soda pop will not even slightly assimilate some of the aluminum metal out of the wall of the can, and thus make a synergistic soda-fluoride-aluminum-sugar cocktail that has slow acting, long-term lifetime effects?

Simple research challenge: Find some unopened soda pop that's several years old, and have a laboratory analyze the ingredients to check the aluminum content.


NOTE: The following data on Sweden and Holland could not be found in official medical, dental or other scientific literature, almost as if it had been purged or never been reported at all.

13 June 1970 the Gothenburg POST (Sweden), 5 Aug 1970 the NEWS REGISTER (Sweden), and 1 May 1970 NORSK FOLKEHELSELAG (Norway) TRANSLATED INTO ENGLISH:

In 1969 the country of Sweden intended to fluoridate their water supply due to the strong advice of Professor Yngve Ericsson, a Swedish dentist who was also the senior representative on the World Health Organization's Expert Committee on Fluoridation. However, it was then found that Professor Ericsson coincidentally was the holder of two highly-profitable patents on fluoride toothpaste!

A subsequent investigation disclosed that the World Health Organization's numerous so-called "objective" comparative studies on mortality and morbidity for fluoridated vs. non-fluoridated areas simply didn't exist! The investigation stated that the World Health Organization's report was unacceptable from a scientific point of view, and that some of the claims set forth in the WHO report actually lack any and every basis in fact. The conclusion was that the details given by WHO on risks and safety margins were grossly defective. Sweden thus remains non-fluoridated, to this day.


In the mid 1970's the Netherlands fluoridated the city of Amsterdam, after which an investigation disclosed that between 100,000 and 200,000 people had developed "more or less severe side effects" to fluoride. A subsequent campaign by concerned physicians and public resulted in fluoride's complete removal from the Netherland's water supply, and the national law was also changed in such a way to permanently ban future fluoridation for the Netherlands.


June 28, 1974: Little William Kennerly, age 3, of New York died just four hours after receiving a brush-on stannous fluoride treatment during his first and only trip to the dentist. William didn't know that he wasn't supposed to swallow the fluoride, and he paid with his life.

Extracts from the autopsy report, performed by a Dr. Torno on 25 May 1974 at Kings County Mortuary:

"William Kennerly

Case #K74-3511

Age: 3 years

Height: 39"

Weight: 32 lb

Clinical history - the child swallowed about 45cc of 2% stannous fluoride

solution in the pediatric dental clinic, Bristol Street Clinic, at 9:30 a.m.

He was given epiniphrine I.M. in dental clinic and sent to Brookdale

Medical Center for close observation. The child came to Brookdale Medical

Center at 12:30 noon, was well until 1:00 when suddenly went into

Cardiac respiratory arrest and was in shock. The child vomited out and

had an unrecordable blood pressure. He finally expired on May 24, 1974,

at 2:00 p.m."

A toxicologist's report stated that little William had swallowed the equivalent of three lethal doses. His parents later collected several hundred thousand dollars in a wrongful-death lawsuit, but that was small consolation for the senseless loss of their son.

Toothpaste is similar in this regard, because a typical family-sized 7-ounce tube of toothpaste contains enough stannous fluoride or sodium fluoride to kill a 20-pound child. To test this, just call the 800 number listed on your toothpaste box, tell them that your 2-year-old child has just eaten half a tube of toothpaste and that he's now vomiting, act frantic, and watch how quickly your call gets patched directly through to a Poison Control Center. (It's common for a child to vomit for 12 hours, after eating a large quantity of toothpaste.)

July 21, 1975: When confronted with new evidence regarding the role of fluoride in causing cancer, U.S. Congressman Delaney recommended immediate suspension of all artificial fluoridation, pending further research. His recommendation was ignored.

Dec. 16, 1975: Congressman Delaney entered into the Congressional Record the results of a new study showing another link between fluoridation and cancer. This time he demanded "that all artificial fluoridation of our water supplies be suspended immediately." Once again, his unprofitable demands were ignored.


THE LIE: August 1, 1979: A letter from the Secretary of the Victorian Branch of the Australian Dental Association stated, "In a community with a fluoridated water supply, the dental manpower required to maintain a good standard of dental health in a community is always halved."

THE TRUTH: The 1976 edition of the C.B.S. News Almanac published figures showing the number of dentists per 100,000 population in 30 "Representative American Cities." Of these 30 cities, 16 were artificially fluoridated. A simple comparison of the fluoridated vs. non-fluoridated cities shows that there were an average of 76.7 dentists per 100,000 population in the fluoridated cities, vs. 59.2 dentists per 100,000 in the non-fluoridated cities. Furthermore, data from the 1971 American Dental Directory, the 1971 U.S. Statistical Abstracts and the 1973 World Almanac reveals that the three American cities which have been fluoridated the longest (Grand Rapids, Newburgh, and Evanston) averaged 121 dentists per 100,000 population, or over twice the national average, after approximately 25 years on fluoridated water. (Data compiled by Phillip R.N. Sutton, D.D.Sc., Melbourne, Australia, 1979.)


24 August, 1982: The Japan Times published an article expressing concern about potential hazards of topical fluoride applications (9000 ppm) to teeth, and fluoride mouth rinses (250-500 ppm) has prompted researchers at the Nippon Dental College in Tokyo to investigate effects of fluoride on hamster fetal cell cultures, with results that can only be described as very disturbing. At the August '82 meeting of the Japanese Society for Cancer Research, Associate Professor of Pharmacology Taketi Tsutsui and his colleague, Dr. Maizumi, reported that 24-hour contact with sodium fluoride solutions at concentrations of 34, 45, and 57 ppm (fluorine ion), results in morphological changes and malignant transformations in second-generation hamster fetal cells. After the one-day fluoride treatment, one group of cells was cultured for one week and then fixed and stained for study. Survival rates of 90, 50 and 30% were found for the exposure to 34, 45, and 57 ppm respectively, with morphological changes of 0.1, 0.5, and 1.0% in the surviving colonies. In the untreated control cultures, the incidence of abnormalities was significantly lower -- only 0.03% or less.

In another series of experiments, cells from the 34 and 45-ppm fluoride treatments were found to have acquired the ability to proliferate in soft agar for an additional 50 to 200 days. These cells were then shown to have developed a strong tumor-forming capacity. In the untreated control cultures, neither proliferated in soft agar nor acquisition of tumor-forming capacity were observed, and only one of four cultures had transformed into one having infinite proliferative characteristics.

Between 100 and 200 days after the sodium fluoride treatment, cells from the 34 and 45-ppm treated cultures were transplanted subdermally into each of two 10-hamster groups. The animals were then observed for the appearance of tumors. All surviving three hamsters in the group that received cells from the 34-ppm treated culture developed cancer (fibro-carcinoma) at the site of injection. Likewise, all eight surviving hamsters receiving the 45-ppm treated cells developed cancer. The other hamsters in both groups died from causes other than cancer, before the experiments were completed. None of the hamsters in the control group that received the untreated cells, developed cancer.


1990: The residents of Cumberland, Maryland voted to ban fluoride from their drinking water, not long after the community's 26-year ban on the chemical was lifted because of the urging of dentists and other special-interest officials. The fluoride issue divided the city such that it was reportedly responsible for the defeat of Cumberland's incumbent pro-fluoride mayor George Wycoff, who lost to Harry Stern, a strong opponent of fluoridation.

1992: Statement by Pennsylvania Justice Flaherty, after 40 days of court hearings on fluoride: "... I entered an injunction against the fluoridation of the public water supply for a large portion of Allegheny County. ... In my view, the evidence is quite convincing that the addition of sodium fluoride to the public water supply at one part per million is extremely deleterious to the human body, and a review of the evidence will disclose that there was no convincing evidence to the contrary." Pennsylvania Supreme Court Justice John P. Flaherty (Townsend Letter For Doctors - June 1992, p. 450)

May 23, 1992: 290 residents of Hooper Bay, Alaska were severely poisoned by sodium fluoride when the city's fluoride dispenser malfunctioned, injecting 150 PPM of fluoride into the drinking water for over a week. Dominic Smith, previously healthy 41 year-old leader of the local National Guard, died of fluoride poisoning after swallowing an estimated 1200-2400 mg of sodium fluoride from the local drinking water supply. One overdose symptom of fluoride is thirst, and Dominic just kept drinking more water until he died.

Fluoride is cumulative in the body--somewhat like radiation--so it's been predicted that those poisoned residents who didn't die will have worsened health for the rest of their life. (We'll know in a few years. Half of the town drank from a different well, and they didn't get sick.)

It's common for a private vested interest to put up a "smokescreen" by redefining terminology to fit their needs. In this case a Public Health Service report regarding the above incident called it an "outbreak" as if it were a live disease organism out of control, instead of the mass poisoning that it actually was. The end justifies the means; it's all God's fault, after all, by being stupid and neglecting to engineer enough fluoride into our bodies.


Similar malfunctions of fluoridation equipment have occasionally happened nationwide over the past 40 years, each accompanied by a careful news cover-up.

Fluoride dispensing machinery is not perfect. Human overdoses of fluoride can be found in such places as Annapolis, Maryland in 1979, when their water treatment plant dumped up to 50 PPM fluoride into their water supply, giving approximately 50,000 people toxic reactions. Officials kept it quiet for 2 weeks afterwards saying, "We didn't want to jeopardize the fluoridation program."

However, Dr. John Yiamouyiannis studied the Annapolis situation after the spill, and reported his findings in a book, "Fluoride the Aging Factor". On page 63 of his book, he stated that more than 5 times the normal number of people died of heart failure in Annapolis during the week following the fluoride spill.

During a conversation in 1992, Dr. Yiamouyiannis stated that the actual cause of the Annapolis spill was a human error, done to cover up a mechanical malfunction that had occurred. Evidently Annapolis had a small fluoride day-tank which was supposed to fill up with fluoride and then the pump would stop. However, the pump malfunctioned and kept running after filling up the tank, and the excess fluoride spilled over into a large waste-sump before it was finally discovered. To cover up the error, the operator who discovered it deliberately pumped the entire overspill (1,000 gallons) directly back into the fresh-water supply.

The Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA 1980:244; 7) had this short PR article on the above fluoride spill, meanwhile carefully avoiding using Annapolis' name:

FLUORIDE. In what the PHS [Public Health Service] calls "the first instance of fluoride overexposure known to have caused serious illness in the 35 years since fluoridation of community water supplies was begun," eight patients undergoing renal dialysis (kidney bypass) in a Maryland community became ill and one died. Charles M. Wax, MD, assigned by the CDC to the Maryland State Department of Health, said investigation revealed that failure to close a valve in the community's treatment plant led to the spilling of 3,800 Liters (1,000 gallons) of 22% hydrofluosilicic acid into the water supply. Further investigation, he said, "raised the possibility of widespread mild fluoride intoxication within the community as the result of drinking overfluoridated water."

Dr. Yiamouyiannis said that many fish in Annapolis pet shops died shortly after the Annapolis fluoride spill.

JAMA's report was false, however. Public records show that contrary to the above PHS claim that Annapolis was the first of such a malfunction, the following 12 U.S. communities had had overdoses of sodium fluoride in their water supplies before that time:

Rome, PA 6/6/72

Stanley County, NC, 4/16/74

Lebanon, PA, 8/20/75

Seattle, WA 5/76

Stanford Univ., CA 1976

Syracuse, NY 3/29/77

Marin County, CA 1977

Harbor Springs, Mi 1977

St. Charles, MN 1978

Los Lunas, NM 11/17/78

Fenton, MI 1979

Island Falls, ME 1979.

Further, since 1979 the following communities have also had fluoride overdoses in their drinking water supplies:

Nisqually Indian Res. WA 1980

Shaftsbury, VT 8/30/80

Potsdam, NY 1981

Morristown, NY 2/7/81

Saratoga Springs, NY 5/81

Pendleton, OR 6/28/81

Jonesboro, ME 10/6/81

Alameda County, CA 1982

Rouses Pt. NY 1982

New Braunsfels, TX 7/3/82

Painted Post Village, NY 12/14/82

Plattsburgh, NY 1/1/83

Marysville, MI 1983

Crown Pt. NM 1983

Grand Rapids, MI 7/84

Vancouver, WA 1/20/85

Elkhart, IN 2/5/85

Charleston, IL 1985

Sequoyah, OK 1986

New Haven CN 1986

Antigo, WI 1989

Hooper Bay, Alaska, May 1992 (one fatality, 290 toxic reactions).

In the July 84 Grand Rapids MI spill, 8 PPM of fluoride was reportedly dumped into that city's water supply for more than a month, before being discovered and repaired. In the 5/92 Hooper Bay Alaska spill, up to 150 PPM fluoride was tested in the village water supply one week before the death of Dominic Smith, the near-death of his sister, and simultaneous flu-like symptoms experienced by over 290 villagers.


In 1989 the State of Illinois had 1,931 public water facilities, 1,000 of which were fluoridated. The State Health Department gave awards out to each state water treatment facility that was able to maintain the recommended dosage of fluoride in their water for the entire year, but they only gave 115 awards out to the 1,000 fluoridation facilities that year, meaning that 885 treatment plants did NOT keep the fluoride dosages within required limits. (Crete Record, Crete, IL 9/21/89)


From an article in the Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 67, No. 2, Pp. 230-238: Researchers in the Dept. of Psychology at Florida International University, North Miami, found a statistically significant delay (almost 1/2 second longer to respond) in visual response to a peripheral light stimulus in subjects given just 1/2 milligram of sodium fluoride. That dose is less fluoride than the amount you get from drinking one cup of coffee or tea made from fluoridated tap water.

June 3, 1993: New Jersey State Assemblyman John V. Kelly held a press conference in Room 109 of the New Jersey State House in Trenton, NJ. He requested that the FDA remove all children's fluoride supplements from the market, after he asked the FDA to supply his office with the studies supporting the safety and effectiveness of children's fluoride supplements and the FDA evidently searched their files back to 1939 and reported to him that NO DRUG APPLICATIONS HAD EVER BEEN FILED FOR THESE PRESCRIPTION DRUGS. All children's fluoride supplements, in the FDA's own words, were and are "unapproved new drugs." The pharmaceutical companies have been openly running a scam for years, by selling these products.

Thus illegal, unscientific but highly profitable fluoride supplements are still being promoted and sold by the medical and dental professions, meanwhile in 1997 the FDA is quietly gearing up on an active campaign to ban common herbs and food supplements from our health food stores for the purpose of redefining them as "drugs" so that pharmaceutical companies will then have a monopoly on these substances. (Follow the money.) To find more data on this, do an internet search on the word CODEX, which is the European program already in place.

1994: The US Public Health Service and the American Dental Association are both continuing to strongly promote and expand the profitable U.S. fluoridation campaign. They boast that over 60% of the United States population is now drinking fluoridated water every day, even though fluoride's only original stated purpose was to aid the developing teeth of children under 14 years.


"Fluorine was substituted for chlorine in Lindane, to make it a far more toxic substance." (Plummer, W.J. and Wall, L.H. Science, Vol. 127, 1958)

"Fluorine is substituted for chlorine in DDT to produce more effective and more toxic insecticides." (Reimschneider, R. Suddent. Apoth. Ztg. 1947)

"Fluorine in the atmosphere increases the sensitivity of the thyroid gland to damaging effects of atmospheric sulfur dioxide." (Gabovich, R.D. et. al., Chemical Abstracts, p. 9051) In other words, fluoride has a synergistic poisoning effect with sulfur dioxide, a component of smog.

"Sodium silicofluoride spray on oranges remains in the peel, and so can cause severe toxicity..." (Union of So. Africa, Dept Agr. Forestry Sci. Bull. No. 236, 1943) Note: Marmalade is made from citrus peel.

"1080, or Sodium Fluoroacetate, is described in a federal training manual as a 'biological high-explosive.' " (Los Angeles Times, December 6, 1970)

Sodium fluoroacetate (also known as FAC, RATBANE 1080, COMPOUND 1080, FRATOL, FURATOL, YASOKNOCK, SODIUM MONOFLUOROACETATE, and SODIUM FLUOACETIC ACID) is listed in a hazardous waste book as being 500 times more toxic to rats than was regular sodium fluoride. This is because it's an "organic metabolite." 1080 was used to kill rodents as early as 1944, but was eventually banned for use in buildings due to dogs dying from eating poisoned rats. In 1952, according to Circular No. 140 of the UCLA College of Agriculture, it was reported that 1080 worked so rapidly that it was impossible to save experimentally poisoned animals, even with first aid and under the best of laboratory conditions. Scientists had yet to find an antidote for 1080 at that time. Only our nerve warfare laboratories have the full story.

QUESTION: If fluoridation of our water supplies was originally stated to be just for the "developing teeth of children under 14," then why were U.S. military bases among the first to fluoridate their water supplies? Why would anybody want Rambo to be STUPID, DOCILE, and SUBSERVIENT? (And why did Admiral Forrestal "commit suicide" by jumping out a window with his hands tied behind his back and a sheet knotted around his neck, not long after he'd adamantly opposed the fluoridation of his military bases, among other things?)

Incidentally, fluoride reactions resemble Attention Deficit Disorder in a certain percentage of the population, and especially in hyperactive children. The simple test of this is to get the person under question off of ALL sources of fluoride (fluoridated water, toothpaste, soda pop bottled with fluoridated water, canned soup, etc.) and see if their condition improves over a period of 3-4 weeks. Use distilled water, because most simple charcoal water filters will not remove fluorides. To remove possible variables, also test the child for negative reactions to sugar and sugar-substitutes.

It's a tragedy that children are given the habit-forming drug Ritalin to counter the effects of a "disease" that might only be due to their adverse reactions to the drug fluoride, and/or to sugar. Following the money, this tragedy is good business, and the "sickness industry" is a multi-multi-billion-dollar business.

Note the following fluoride symptoms as referenced in "Encyclopedia of Pure Materia Medica," Vol IX, p.333. These symptoms--by volunteers who took varying quantities of fluorides--were listed in 1887!


--Great loss of memory, forgets almost everything.

--Good memory in morning, forgetfulness every evening.

--Forgetfulness in his daily employment of dates.

--On making notes, mistakes right for left.

--Mental weakness.

--Mental excitability.

--Feels indifference towards those he loves best.

--Aversion (intense dislike) to his own family, bordering on insanity.

--Gay disposition, everything is satisfactory.

--Excessive hilarity; great buoyancy of mind.

--Greatly depressed in mind.

--Exceedingly anxious, causing sweat; greater in morning than evening.

--Sensation as if danger menaced him, but without fear.

--Felt certain that something dreadful would happen, with dullness in head.

--Fear of apoplexy (stroke).


--Irritable, disagreeing mood.

--Moodiness in evening, greater than morning.

--Very ill humored.

--Discontent and excessive ill humor followed by indifference and forgetfulness, and finally by perfect contentment and uncommonly gay disposition of mind.

--Congestion of blood mostly to forehead.

--Feeling in brain as if on the verge of being struck with apoplexy. (A stroke)

--Vertigo with sickness of stomach.

--A kind of sinking weakness, has to sit down.

--Feeling as if in an earthquake.

--Sensation of weakness, like numbness in head, same in hands.

--Sensation of numbness in forehead.

--Congestion of blood in forehead.

--Heaviness above eyes, with nausea.

--Severe pressing of both temples.

--Compressing pain in temples.

--Slight pain in right temple, followed by left.

--Headache in skull, behind ears.

--Headache accompanied by congestion of blood to head, sensation of numbness.

--Headache every morning.

--Sensation of weakness, like numbness in head.

--Numbness in head and hands.

--Dull, heavy headache.

--Congestive headache.

--Dullness & pressure in back of head.

--Dullness in back of head.

--Pressure on both sides, back of head.

--Headache in back of head, with fullness in head.

--Headache from neck to forehead; dull feeling in head.

--Atrophy of brain.

Is it a coincidence that the above-listed fluoride symptoms sound almost exactly like the TYPICAL EVERYDAY ANECDOTAL PATIENT ILLNESS COMPLAINTS which today's expensive TV commercials, pharmacies, physicians and psychiatrists are so eager to "cure" with their endless supply of profitable new drugs, many of which contain fluoride?

The bottom line is to follow the money. Look at the high standard of living of those who are promoting and distributing the current crop of pharmaceuticals, versus the lower living standards and drug-education level of the ignorant general public who are almost convinced that pharmaceuticals in general are a NUTRIENT. Public sickness and ignorance is good business, in some circles.

--Found on the Internet, March 18, 1997:


Mental Fluorosis: Brain Damage from Exposure to Fluorides

By George Glasser

(Courtesy of Sarasota ECO Report, Guy Alland, Publisher. P.O. Box 35500 Sarasota, FL 34242 (941) 925-1946)

"Those who are for and against fluoridation have little common ground other than issues they disagree on. They cannot dialogue objectively because they have different realities. They see things differently, and have different criteria in determining validity. Our lives are enriched by artists for whom "beauty is in the eye of the beholder." But our lives are often endangered when scientific truth is in the eye of the beholder." (Dr. Schatz, discoverer of streptomycin)

Only now are the insidious facts about Sarin (nerve gas) surfacing as more comes out about the "Gulf War Syndrome" and the Tokyo subway incident. It appears that with both incidents, the people exposed to Sarin are suffering from a variety of chronic adverse health and lingering neurotoxic effects such as memory loss.

Sarin is the most potent neurotoxic substance known. Sarin is also a fluorinated organophosphate similar to, but more toxic to humans than the insecticide Parathion. Sarin is the prime example of toxicokinetics of the fluorine ion. When the fluorine ion is combined with relatively benign substances it often creates a powerful toxicant (toxic synergism). With Sarin, the fluorine ion is like an arming mechanism for the relatively benign organophosphate which transforms it into a compound with one hell-of-a-wallop.

Acute exposure to Sarin, a drop about the size of a grain of sand, causes spasms (tetany), heart palpitations (cardiac arrhythmia), many other neurological disorders, and possibly, collapse of the nervous system and death. Production of acetylcholine, the most important chemical for nervous system function is disrupted. Acetylcholine is responsible for carrying all neuro-transmissions in the brain and throughout the nervous system of the body.

Many animal studies of fluorinated organophosphates also suggest a delayed neurotoxic reaction similar to those experiences by those people exposed to Sarin.

With water fluoridation, the public is exposed to a variety of fluorides, and aside from the fluorine ion, some of those fluorides are neurotoxic. Many scientists discount the fluorine ion as being neurotoxic; however, the weight of scientific evidence strongly indicates that the fluorine ion is, if nothing else, the perpetrator. This is evidenced by the variety of highly effective fluorinated drugs that are used to treat mental disorders, and the fluorine ion's role in the devastating effectiveness of Sarin as a chemical nerve agent.

Many psychoactive drugs are fluorinated. Two of the most noted are Prozac and Rohypnol (better known as the infamous date-rape drug, "Roofs."). Rohypnol is fluorinated Valium, which is about 20-30 times more potent than Valium alone. Essentially, these drugs effect enzyme functions in certain areas of the brain to achieve the desired effect. The primary ingredients of most psychoactive drugs suppress enzyme production, and the fluorine ion is also an enzyme inhibitor. The one particular side effect common to almost all fluorinated drugs which is mentioned in the Physician's Desk Reference is memory loss. These drugs include Fenfluramine (a fluorinated weight loss drug), fluorinated corticosteroids, and fluorinated psychoactive drugs. Memory loss and learning disorders are associated with the hippocampal area of the brain.

On page 125 of the Toxicological Profile for Fluorides it is stated: "Neurotoxicity: Because fluoride interacts with calcium ions needed for effective neurotransmission, fluoride can affect the nervous system." This statement is reinforced by recent studies performed by Dr. Robert Isaacson and Dr. Phyllis Mullenix which were concluded shortly after the publication of the profile.

Since 1992 there have been three studies confirming that fluorides affect brain functions. Dr. Robert Isaacson, Binghamton University, New York conducted two studies using low levels of aluminum fluoride and sodium fluoride. The levels were similar to the amounts people are exposed to on a daily basis from fluoridated toothpastes and drinking water. Results showed that both types of fluorides were neurotoxic. The most recent study, "Neurotoxicity of Sodium Fluoride in Rats", Mullenix, et al, published in Neurotoxicology and Teratology 1995, was done using larger doses of sodium fluoride and corroborated the results of both Isaacson studies (1992 &.1994).

All the studies demonstrated that the hippocampal region (learning center) of the brain was the most susceptible to the effects of fluorides.

It was also stated in the study published in Neurotoxicology and Teratology, 1995, Mullenix, et al, that: "Hyperactivity and cognitive deficits are generally linked with hippocampal damage, and in fact, the hippocampus is considered to be the central processor which integrates inputs from the environment, memory, and motivational stimuli to produce behavioral decisions and modify memory." However, the researchers said that although the behavior of rats does not extrapolate to humans, the generic behavioral patterns created in rats from fluoride exposure can and probably do occur in humans. They also said the problems that might occur in humans from typical chronic fluoride exposure during pregnancy and early childhood are: "motor-sensory dysfunction, IQ deficits' and/or learning disabilities" (environmentally induced retardation of brain development).

While Dr. Mullenix's study dealt only with sodium fluoride, Dr. Isaacson's studies focused on aluminum fluoride compared to sodium fluoride and were performed to determine if fluoridated water's effect on leaching aluminum or combining with the aluminum sulphate added to some water as a clarifier [by water treatment facilities] had an impact on the development of Alzheimer's Disease. Alzheimer's studies had determined that there was a significant build-up of aluminum in the brains of people with Alzheimer's disease. Population studies also suggested that there appeared to be a higher incidence of Alzheimer's disease among people who lived in fluoridated areas which was the impetus for Dr. Isaacson's study.

Isaacson's study indicated that the aluminum fluoride was more neurotoxic than the sodium fluoride.

Recent studies in China, where coal containing fluorides is used for cooking and heating, determined that fluorides released during burning and inhaled by young children were responsible for lowered IQ's.

Documents with regards to the neurotoxic effects of fluoride exposure among the workers who processed uranium for the first nuclear bombs in 1944 were recently declassified by the government. These documents indicate that the US Government has known for more than fifty years that fluorides are neurotoxic. Other studies dating back to 1949 indicate that exposure to fluorides can have neurotoxic effects on animals.

The first form of nerve gas, Soman (a fluorine compound) was developed by the Germans during World War II which indicates that scientists were well aware of neurotoxicity of fluoride compounds almost sixty years ago.

Through water fluoridation, the general population, especially children who are most susceptible to developmental changes, are exposed to fluorides. In the "Toxicological Profile for Fluorides", 1993, page 90, it states, "The fluorine ion carried in human blood serum exists in two forms, namely as an inorganic ion (F-) and in combination with an organic molecule. The toxicological significance of the latter form is unknown. A portion of circulating fluoride acts as an enzyme inhibitor because it forms metal-fluoride-phosphate complexes that interfere with the activity of those enzymes requiring a metal ion cofactor. In addition, fluoride may interact directly with the enzyme or the substrate. It is a general inhibitor of the energy production system of the cell...."

The fluorine ion has a negative electrical charge while metal ions have a positive electrical charge, and they readily combine to form metal-fluoride-complexes. Both metal ions and fluorine ions are very small. Consequently, they can easily pass through cell membranes. Once in the cell, a natural chemical reaction occurs where the fluorine ion is released from the metal ion. The fluorine ion interferes with the enzyme function and continues on, while the metal ion is left behind. It is also possible for the fluorine ion to attach to a trace mineral such as zinc which is essential to enzyme function and remove it from the cell. This same scenario is how fluoride acts as a delivery mechanism for psychoactive drugs, but with water fluoridation, the passenger is a neurotoxic substance such as lead, mercury or aluminum for which the brain is the target organ.

Because the poisoning of the brain is accomplished from chronic, low-level doses of highly potent (synergized) metal-fluoride-complexes, conventional standards used to determine intoxication would be inadequate (a linear dose-response to a particular neurotoxic substance). Like Rohypnol or Sarin, the neurotoxic substances may well be synergized with the addition of the fluorine ion. Consequently, lead or mercury fluoride combinations could be much more neurotoxic than the independent metal ion.

While symptoms may indicate that a person is suffering from neurotoxicity, the method and standards used to measure toxicity and/or serum levels of substances would not indicate toxic levels in the body. The present accepted method used by researchers to determine adverse effects is to attempt to target a single substance as the causative rather than address chemical interactions that can and do occur when chemicals are metabolized in the human body or through environmental reactions. The consequences of not considering synergized chemical interactions would be misdiagnoses and possibly the prescribing of a medication that may exacerbate the condition. To further confound the problem, there are only several animal studies available on the neurotoxic effects of metal-fluoride-complexes on which to base any diagnosis.

The present thought among most pro and anti-fluoridation scientists and researchers is that since the neurotoxic metal-fluoride-complexes are only found at trace levels in fluoridated water, they are of little significance. Most scientists are only concerned with how much of a specific toxicant will cause an adverse immediate health effect, not how little of a synergized toxicant will cause an adverse health effect with prolonged chronic, low-level exposure.

The problem with fluorides is that it is difficult to prove that the fluorine ion had anything to do with a metabolic crime involving neurotoxic damage related to metal-fluoride-complexes. This is because the fluorine ion is the vehicle that carries the neurotoxic substance, effectively delivers it to the target area of the brain where it will do the most damage, leaves it, and then continues on its metabolic journey.

With lethal doses of poisons such as Sarin or sodium fluoroacetate, it would be almost impossible to determine that a person had been poisoned from the fluorinated toxicants. This is because of the bioactivity of the fluorine ion which is in a constant state of transition as it travels through the body. With these fluoride compounds, the examining physician would have to know that a person was exposed to these substances to determine the cause of death, otherwise, it would be written off as heart failure. Diagnosing the effects of chronic, low-level exposure to fluoride compounds would be almost impossible unless appropriate research was done to determine what those adverse affects were and that the physicians were aware of the research.

In essence, it can be said that the ubiquitous fluorine ion when combined with another substance could be the perpetrator of almost perfect neurological or biological crimes. This is because: 1. Neither toxic levels of the fluorine ion nor the accomplice substance can be placed at the scene of the crime in significant amounts to indicate intoxication; 2. Scientists generally discount toxic synergism as a factor with chronic fluoride toxicity; and 3. there is no research data on which to base a diagnosis.

The weight of scientific evidence suggests that the fluorine ion is the most logical perpetrator of neurotoxic damage. It is also a scientific fact that the fluorine ion has a particular affinity for metal ions of which some, such as lead, aluminum and mercury are neurotoxic and accumulate in brain tissues. And it is a well known scientific fact among toxicologists that the fluorine ion acts as a synergizing agent for many toxicants. Consequently, it is only logical to assume that the neurotoxic metal-fluoride-phosphate complexes act as potentiated neurotoxicants. [Note: Only several hundred registered professional toxicologists exist in the entire U.S.)

The only adverse effects most scientists are interested in with regards to water fluoridation are the effects of the fluorine ion, which is an intangible, and which accumulates in endpoint tissues after the fact (meaning, after the metabolic damage has been done). The fluorine ion, alone, only exists instantaneously in a transitional phase during such a chemical reaction. Long term effects of low-level chronic exposure to synergized fluoride compounds/complexes are possibly considered inconsequential, although the population is exposed to low-levels of these cumulative chemicals on a daily basis via fluoridated water, toothpaste, mouthwash, residual fluorinated insecticides, pesticides, herbicides and fungicides on fruits and vegetables along with environmental fluoride pollution.

In the Journal of Dental Research, Vol. 69, Feb. 1990, pg. 584, there is a mention of toxic synergism and concern over metal-fluoride complexes in Recommendations from Session IV, Needed Research, #7, "Consider variations in physiological, nonphysiological, and pathological changes __ for example, diet, ambient temperature, altitude, environmental pollution and disease states. Environmental pollutants __ heavy metals, for example __ should be monitored not just for their effects on Fluorine but for their other effects per se".

The effects of long-term, low-level exposure to these cumulative metal-fluoride complexed neurotoxicants and organophosphates are contingent on several factors: The age of the person, diet, health, vitamin and mineral deficiencies, genetic disposition, ethnicity, length of exposure, previous exposure to neurotoxicants, medications, and environmental factors. Not all people react the same.

There is much research data on the neurotoxic effects of lead, mercury and aluminum: Lead is associated with environmental retardation (learning disorders); mercury is associated with various nervous and mental disorders (the "mad hatter" syndrome, where hatters once used mercury to make felt hats); and aluminum has been associated with memory loss (Presenile dementia, or Alzheimer's disease). However, since there are only several studies about neurotoxic metal-fluoride-complexes, one can only speculate what effects chronic, long-term, low-level exposure to synergistic combinations of these complexes could be.

In reviewing pharmaceutical, agricultural and chemical warfare research data, it appears safe to assume that the neurotoxic effects of metal-fluoride-complexes would be magnified as with the case of Rohypnol and other psychoactive drugs. It is also logical to believe, that like soldiers suffering from Sarin exposure ("Gulf War Syndrome"), there might not be an antidote for the adverse metabolic reaction caused by organophosphates that are also used in agricultural products or metal-fluoride-complexes. Possibly, continued chronic exposure to low-levels of fluorides might well exacerbate the initial effects.

(END of George Glasser's article)



As previously stated, Sarin was developed and used by the Nazis in Germany, used by terrorists in Tokyo several years ago (in Newsweek Magazine's coverage photos of the Tokyo gas attack, did you notice the photo of numerous small light-green barrels clearly marked SODIUM FLUORIDE, in the terrorist's Sarin-manufacturing facility?), and used by Iraq in the Gulf War.

The following EPA Chemical Profile of SARIN nerve gas was recently published on the Internet, after pressure from Gulf War Syndrome veterans. Notice this quote from SECTION VII of the following chemical profile, regarding the neutralization of SARIN: "Rapidly hydrolyzed by dilute aqueous sodium hydroxide or sodium carbonate forming relatively non-toxic products. Water alone removes the fluorine atom, producing a non-toxic acid (Merck 1983, p. 1204)"




CHEMICAL IDENTITY - SARIN (Military Chemical Nerve Agent)

CAS Registry Number: 107-44-8

Synonyms [alternate names]: (NIOSH/RTECS 1983 Synonyms, Volume 3, p. 122)

-- GB

-- MFI


-- T-144

-- T-2106

-- TL 1618

-- Sarin II

-- Trilone 46

-- Isopropyl Methylfluorophosphate

-- Isopropyl Methanefluorophosphonate

-- Isopropoxymethylphosphoryl Fluoride

-- Isopropyl-Methyl-Phosphoryl Fluoride

-- Phosphine Oxide, Fluoroisopropoxymethyl

-- Methylphosphonofluoridic Acid-Isopropyl Ester

-- Phosphoric Acid, Methyifluoro-Isopropyl Ester

-- Phosphonofluoridic Acid, Methyl-Isopropyl Ester

Chemical Formula: C4H10FO2P

Molecular Weight: 140.11



Toxicity Value Used for Listing Under Section 302: LC50 inhalation

(human) 0.07 mg/liter (*NIOSH/RTECS 1985)

TPQ: 10 (pounds)

RQ: 1 (pound) (statutory, for notification under SARA Section 304(a)(2))

Section 313 Listed (Yes or No): No


Physical State: Liquid

Boiling Point: 2970F, 1470C (Merck 1983, p. 1204)

Specific Gravity (H2O=1): 1.10 at 200C/40C (Merck 1983, p. 1204)

Vapor Pressure (mmHg): 2.9 at 250C (U.S. Army 1975, p. 3-4)

Melting Point: -710F, -570C (Merck 1983, p. 1204)

Vapor Density (AIR=l): 4.86 (U.S. Army 1975, p. 3-4)

Evaporation Rate (Butyl acetate=1): About the same as water (U.S. Army 1975, p. 3-4)

Solubility in Water: Miscible with and hydrolyzed by water (Merck 1983, p. 1204)

Appearance and Odor: Liquid (Merck 1983, p. 1204). A colorless liquid and vapor. Almost no odor in pure state (U.S. Army 1975, p. 3-3 to 3-4).


OSHA PEL: Not Found

ACGIH TLV: Not Found

IDLH: Not Found

Other Limits Recommended: Not Found

Routes of Entry: Inhalation: Yes (U.S. Army 1975, p. 3-4)

Skin: Yes (U.S. Army 1975, p. 3-4)

Ingestion: Yes (U.S. Army 1975, p. 3-4)

Health Hazards (Acute, Delayed, and Chronic): Extremely toxic; lethal dose in humans may be as low as 0.01 mg/kg. [10 parts per billion.] Extremely active cholinesterase inhibitor. Toxic effects similar to, but more severe than those of parathion (Merck 1983, p. 1204). Death within 15 minutes after fatal dose is absorbed (U.S. Army 1975, p. 3-4).

Medical Conditions Generally Aggravated by Exposure: Not Found


Flash Point (Method Used): Non-flammable (U.S. Army 1975, p. 3-4)

Flammable Limits:

LEL: Not Found

UEL: Not Found

Extinguishing Methods: Extinguish with foam, carbon dioxide, and dry chemical (Sax 1984, p. 1662)

Special Fire Fighting Procedures: Protective clothing and respiratory protection (U.S. Army 1975, p. 3-5).

Unusual Fire and Explosion Hazards: Non-flammable (U.S. Army 1975, p. 3-5)

NFPA Flammability Rating: Not Found


Stable: Yes (U.S. Army 1975, p. 3-4)

Conditions to Avoid: Not Found

Incompatibility (Materials to Avoid): Slightly corrosive to steel (U.S. Army 1975, p. 3-4). Hydrolyzed by water (Merck 1983, p. 1204).

Hazardous Decomposition or Byproducts: Acidic conditions produce hydrogen fluoride; alkaline conditions produce isopropyl alcohol and polymers (U.S. Army 1975, p. 3-4). When heated to decomposition or reacted with steam, it emits very toxic fumes of fluorides and oxides of phosphorus (Sax 1984, p. 1662).

Hazardous Polymerization:

May Occur: Not Found

May Not Occur: Not Found

Conditions to Avoid: Not Found


Quick-acting military chemical nerve agent (U.S. Army, p. 3-4). Chemical warfare agent (Merck 1983, p. 1204).


Rapidly hydrolyzed by dilute aqueous sodium hydroxide or sodium carbonate forming relatively non-toxic products. Water alone removes the fluorine atom producing a non-toxic acid (Merck 1983, p. 1204).

Decontaminants include bleach slurry, dilute alkali, hot soapy water, steam and ammonia (U.S. Army 1975, p. 3-4).


For emergency situations, wear a positive pressure, pressure-demand, full facepiece self-contained breathing apparatus (SCBA) or pressure-demand supplied air respirator with escape SCBA and a fully-encapsulating, chemical resistant suit. See the introductory information section at the beginning of the profiles for additional information.

SUIT MATERIAL PERFORMANCE (Based on EPA/USCG "Guidelines", 1987)

(Chemical Resistance/Amount of Data)

Butyl/Neoprene GOOD/LIMITED**

Viton/Neoprene GOOD/LIMITED**

*Based on qualitative performance information.

**Based on a chemical analog.


Signs and Symptoms of Exposure: Symptoms include difficulty in breathing, drooling, excessive sweating, nausea, vomiting, cramps, involuntary defecation and urination, twitching, jerking, staggering, headache, confusion, drowsiness, coma, convulsion, dimness of vision and pinpoint pupils (U.S. Army 1975, p. 3-3)

Emergency and First Aid Procedures: Immediate decontamination of the smallest drop is essential. Vapor penetrates the skin (U.S. Army 1975, p. 3.4). Toxic effects are similar to parathion (Sax 1984, p. 1662). Treatment for parathion is as follows: move victim to fresh air; call emergency medical care. If not breathing, give artificial respiration. If breathing is difficult, give oxygen. In case of contact with material, immediately flush skin or eyes with running water for at least 15 minutes. Speed in removing material from skin is of extreme importance. Remove and isolate contaminated clothing and shoes at the site. Keep victim quiet and maintain normal body temperature. Effects may be delayed; keep victim under observation (DOT 1984, Guide 55).


copyright Tom Swans  http://www.astrallion.nl/fluoride.html

Fluoride, teeth and the Atomic Bomb

Increasing Dosage and Long Term Effects

                            FLUORIDES: Biologic Effects of Atmospheric Pollutants, Committee on Biologic
                            Effects of Atmospheric Pollutants, Division of Medical Sciences, National Research
                            Council, National Academy of Sciences, Washington, D.C. (1971):

                            "The daily intake of fluoride consists of approximately 0.2 mg from foods, some
                            amount contributed from drinking water (which depends on the concentration of
                            fluoride in the water supply), and fluoride from industrial sources, dentifrices, and
                            possibly drugs. For the average U.S. adult not working in a fluoride industry and
                            using a water supply containing 1 mg/liter, the approximate daily intake is 1.2-1.5 mg
                            of fluoride."

                            Drinking Water and Health, (1977) pages 371-372:

                            "Recent studies indicate that the total intake of fluoride is as high as 3 mg/day
                            rather than the earlier figure of 1.5 mg/day, primarily because of increases in the
                            estimated levels of fluoride in food. (Spencer et al., 1970). Balance data presented by
                            Spencer also suggest a higher retention by bone, nearly 2 mg/day rather than the
                            0.2 mg/day indicated earlier."

                            "Two recent articles from Spencer's group (Kramer et al., 1974; Dace et al., 1974)
                            appear to support a higher estimate for dietary fluoride intake. The first is based on
                            hospital-prepared food from 16 U.S. cities. The fluoride intake from food in the
                            fluoridated communities was found to range from 1.6 to 3.4 mg/day (av. 2.6) while
                            that from nonfluoridated cities was 0.8-1.0 mg (av. 0.9). The very high values and the
                            marked difference between fluoridated and nonfluoridated cities can be explained in
                            part by the inclusion of coffee and other water-based beverages as dietary intake, a
                            classification not usually followed by other investigators. The second article reports
                            average fluoride intake from diets used in balance studies in a fluoridated city over a
                            6-yr period as 2.0 mg/day.

                            "These findings are important because, if valid, they might represent a shift in intake
                            that could lead to dental fluorosis in fluoridated communities. Also, a retention of 2
                            mg/day would mean that an average individual would experience skeletal
                            fluorosis after 40 yr, based on an accumulation of 10,000 ppm fluoride in bone
                            ash. However, these new estimates for fluoride in food are questionable;
                            consequently, so are their implications. The values are suspect because of analytical
                            problems. The diffusion method of Singer and Armstrong (1969a) was used with a
                            colorimetric reagent and false high values are obtained with this technique (Taves,

                            Dietary Reference Intakes - page 289

                            "The fractional retention or balance of fluoride at any age depends on the
                            quantitative features of absorption and excretion. For healthy, young, or middle-aged
                            adults, approximately 50 percent of absorbed fluoride is retained by uptake in
                            calcified tissues, and 50 percent is excreted in the urine. For young children, as much
                            as 80 percent can be retained owing to increased uptake by the developing skeleton
                            and teeth."

                            Krishnamachari, 1987. Fluorine. Pp. 365-415 in W. Mertz, ed. Trace Elements in
                            Human and Animal Nutrition, Vol. 1. Academic Press, San Diego, California - Edited by
                            Walter Mertz, U.S. Department of Agriculture - cited by NAS/NRC/IOM in
                            Recommended Dietary Allowances:

                            "Fluorine being a cumulative bone-seeking mineral, the resultant skeletal changes
                            are progressive. According to the natural course of the disease, skeletal fluorosis may
                            be classified into the following phases: preclinical, musculoskeletal, degenerative and
                            destructive, crippling fluorosis, and complications. ... effects depend not only on the
                            total dosage and duration of exposure, but also on associated factors such as
                            nutritional status, functional status of the renal tissue, and interaction with other
                            trace elements. Since the effect of fluorine is cumulative, the less serious
                            consequences occur early in the natural course of the disease. Whatever may be the
                            type of fluorine exposure, the clinical picture in chronic poisoning occurs in a phased

                            "... Pain is a cardinal feature due to arthritic lesions and to secondary peripheral
                            nerve involvement. ... workers at risk: aluminum smelters, phosphate fertilizer,
                            ceramics, steel, glass industries.

                            "... Fluorine is known to bind calcium in the body, causing ionic calcium to decrease;
                            this, in turn, causes secondary hyperparathyroidism.

                            "... Some industries discharge fluorine in gaseous or other form, polluting their
                            respective neighborhoods with abnormally high amounts of fluorine, which may result
                            in human and /or cattle disease. The clinical picture is similar to endemic skeletal
                            fluorosis with dental and bone changes. ... Waldbott described human fluorosis in the
                            neighborhood of an Ohio enamel factory affecting 23 persons and dogs in the
                            neighborhood. The symptoms were indicative of the preskeletal phase. Urinary
                            fluoride excretion: 0.4 to 2.4 mg/day.

                            "... Renal stones, reported to be common in endemic fluorosis areas, are capable of
                            accumulating considerable amounts of fluorine. ... Although the exact genesis of renal
                            stones in fluorine toxicity is not known, it is conjectured that insoluble calcium fluoride
                            is deposited in the urinary tract as a nucleus around which other salts are

                            Health Effects of Ingested Fluoride, NAS/NRC 1993:

                            "In stage 1 of skeletal fluorosis, there might be occasional stiffness or pain in the
                            joints and some osteosclerosis of the pelvis and vertebral column. Bone-ash fluoride
                            concentrations in stage 1 usually range from 6,000 to 7,000 ppm. When bone-ash
                            fluoride concentrations are 7,500-8,000 ppm or more, stages 2 and 3 of skeletal
                            fluorosis are likely to occur. The clinical signs of these stages are chronic joint pain,
                            dose-related calcification of ligaments, osteosclerosis, possibly osteoporosis of long
                            bones, and in severe cases, muscle wasting and neurological defects.

                            "Crippling skeletal fluorosis might occur in people who have ingested 10-20 mg of
                            fluoride per day for 10-20 years."

                            HODGE 1979 - Harold C. Hodge, Ph.D., The Safety of Fluoride, page 255, in Johansen
                            E, Taves DR, Olsen TO, eds. Continuing evaluation of the use of fluorides. Boulder,
                            CO: Westview, 1979. (American Association for the Advancement of Science selected
                            symposium no. 11):

                            DENTAL EFFECTS - "The most important and widely disregarded fact about dental fluorosis
                            is this: no safe established daily intake exists, i.e., the maximal amount in mg fluoride
                            which consumed daily does NOT produce cosmetically damaging extensive white
                            areas or brown stain in some individuals has not been fixed."

                            NON-DENTAL EFFECTS - "Among the many effects of fluoride (real or purported) are a few
                            that have been so well studied that quantitative dose-effect relations can be
                            estimated albeit with variable numerical certainty. Only three of these effects have
                            been observed in man: acute poisoning -death following a single dose; chronic
                            poisoning -crippling fluorosis, the final stage of advanced osteofluorosis, first
                            detectable as an increase in the radio- graphic density of the skeleton
                            (osteosclerosis); and dental fluorosis. Five other chronic fluoride effects have been
                            well studied in experimental animals: kidney injury, anemia, interference with
                            reproduction, changes in thyroid structure or function, and body weight loss."

                            "Chronic effects follow protracted exposures. Crippling fluorosis as an occupational
                            disease follows exposures estimated at 10 to over 25 mg of fluoride daily during
                            periods of 10-20 years."