Al-Ahram Weekly | Region | A cancerous web of deception Al-Ahram Weekly
1 - 7 February 2001
Issue No.519
Published in Cairo by AL-AHRAM established in 1875
The VISIE Foundation
A cancerous web of deception
By Ashraf El-Bayoumi*
Efforts over recent years by human rights activists to expose the disastrous
health consequences of using depleted uranium (DU) weapons were for the most
part unsuccessful. Weapons containing DU made their debut in combat during the
1991 Gulf war, when more than 300 tons were used -- substantially more than
the 12 tons subsequently dropped on Kosovo and Bosnia. Large areas of southern
Iraq, and parts of Kuwait and Saudi Arabia, have as a consequence been
Thousands of Iraqi civilians and soldiers were exposed to DU. An unprecedented
number of deadly cancers and unusual deformities has since been documented
amongst them. Babies born to these victims are more likely to be severely
deformed than is statistically normal. Thousands of Kuwaiti and Saudi Arabian
civilians were also likely to have been exposed to DU dust, as were thousands
of US, UK and Arab soldiers who participated in the war. Egyptians were
undoubtedly exposed as well.
DU weapons were used in Bosnia in 1994 and then Yugoslavia in 1999. Reports of
widespread outbreaks of cancer related to radioactive DU among Iraqi civilians
and soldiers were met with repeated denials. Ailments among thousands of US
and UK soldiers who participated in the Gulf war, known as Gulf War Syndrome,
received a persistent "lack of evidence" argument, as did initial reports of
"the Balkan Syndrome" among NATO soldiers and civilians.
However, when 15 European peace keepers who served in the Balkans suddenly
died from leukaemia, the catastrophic effects of DU weapons became front-page
news. Several European leaders expressed their alarm and called for the
identification and clean-up of areas targeted by DU weapons and for medical
screening of those who were exposed to it.
So the wall of silence and denials has slowly begun to crumble. Previously
concealed official reports that clearly warned in advance of potential health
hazards are now being openly written about in the media. One example is a
confidential paper issued by the UK Atomic Energy Commission that warned of
radioactive contamination as a result of the use of DU. Another is a letter
issued by the US Army Surgeon General's Office requiring more details about
DU, "because the effects on soldiers from exposure to DU dust include a
possible increased risk of cancer (lung and bone) and kidney damage."
Shells tipped with DU are highly effective in piercing armour due to uranium's
high density (1.7 times that of lead) and inflammable properties that make it
ignite instantly and, therefore, roast alive anyone inside the armoured
vehicle it penetrates. DU is the byproduct of the enrichment process to
produce weapons-grade nuclear material and nuclear fuel.
As a result of 50 years of nuclear weapon and nuclear fuel production in the
US, there are now in excess of one million tons of DU in existence. Storing
large amounts of radioactive and poisonous material presents a problem for the
US government, which, therefore, provides it free to arms manufacturers -- who
reap huge profits as a result.
Despite its name, the percentage of fissionable (and more radioactive) uranium
isotopes in DU is roughly fifty per cent of that present in natural uranium.
The name "depleted" is deceiving, since DU remains radioactive. Moreover, as a
heavy metal, DU is highly toxic. Upon impact, it burns and produces tiny
aerosolised particles of oxidised uranium that become airborne and can spread
for 40 kilometres or more. This radioactive toxic dust enters humans by
inhalation and by the ingestion of contaminated animals, water and plants.
There is, for obvious reasons, tremendous resistance at the Pentagon to the
release of any information that may eventually lead to a ban on those
effective "wonder" weapons. The Pentagon wants to protect DU weapons for
future wars. A main concern is the possibility that compensation amounting to
billions of dollars would be paid to hundreds of thousands of victims, along
with billions more to finance clean-up operations. Admission that there is a
link between DU weapons and cancer would also have damaging political fallout,
since several scholars have already determined that DU weapons are illegal
according to international law.
All these considerations help explain the official denial campaign aided by a
general blackout by the Western media on the subject. One can compare this to
the years of effort undertaken by many activists to expose the use of the
highly toxic Agent Orange in Vietnam.
Last week it was reported that traces of Uranium-236 have been found in spent
DU shells retrieved from the battlefields of Kosovo. This has resulted in
alarm and anxiety in Europe, since U-236 is 10 times more radioactive than DU
and "acts very quickly." These new revelations may explain the quick deaths of
exposed soldiers. U-236 does not occur in natural uranium, but rather is
created by nuclear reactors. Its presence must, therefore, mean that DU has
been contaminated with recycled nuclear fuel.
Moreover, it could mean that other highly dangerous isotopes such as plutonium
are also present. On 20 January, the German defence minister strongly
criticised the US for failing to inform its NATO partners of these facts which
were previously known to Pentagon officials. A newly published book in France,
Depleted Uranium, Invisible War, refers to a US military report in 1995
stating that DU provided by the US government "may contain trace amounts of
Scientific studies in Iraq have shown a four-fold increase in the incidence of
cancer in battleground and neighboring areas. The relationship of this sudden
increase to the Gulf war has been confirmed. Other studies examined the
relative frequencies of various types of cancer and found them to be similar
to those in Chernobyl after the infamous nuclear accident there.
A recent international conference organised by the Spanish Solidarity
Committee also dealt with DU's health effects. One of the papers revealed that
there is a clear correlation between the incidence of cancer and the locations
where DU was used in Iraq. Isotopes found in plants near battlefields confirm
conclusively that uranium is its source. As a scientist who had the
opportunity to attend two international meetings on DU and reviewed the
available data, I personally find that the methodology is sound, and the
evidence convincing.
Recently, Ramsey Clark (former US attorney general) and Damacio Lopez (a
health activist researcher) reported in the Italian parliament that the
samples they had collected a day earlier from the Iraqi desert have "extremely
high radioactivity." Undoubtedly, more comprehensive studies, surveys and
medical screenings are urgently needed. Only then will the extent of the
damage be adequately assessed and individuals requiring medical attention be
identified. An independent international scientific study would be
particularly welcome. This will counter claims that there is a lack of
evidence and "no epidemiological data". Moreover, it would provide all the
necessary legal evidence.
Particularly important to consider is that the amount of DU weapons used in
the Balkans was only a fraction of what was used in the killing fields of
Iraq. Moreover, DU shells are suspected of having been fired at Palestinians
during the Intifada.
Why is it that the Western media has not given proportional coverage to the
disastrous effects of use of DU in Iraq? Why have the Arab governments,
including the Egyptian government, not initiated independent studies to
investigate the matter? Why did the authorities not carry out medical surveys
amongst the thousands of soldiers -- Egyptian, Kuwaiti, Iraqi, and Saudi -- to
determine the extent of exposure to DU during the Gulf war?
Why have questions not been raised in the People's Assembly in Egypt? Why has
the Egyptian and other Arab media not thoroughly examined the issues related
to DU? Why do we not hear protests and condemnation from the Arab world
against the Pentagon and the British military for their use of DU in Iraq and
for concealing information regarding the hazards of DU dust during the Gulf

* The writer is a professor of physical chemistry & biophysics in Michigan
State University and Alexandria University, and Vice- President of Alexandria
Human Rights Association.
Recommend this page
Related stories:
A deathly silence on Depleted Uranium 18 - 24 January 2001
Sophisticated weaponry 11 - 17 January 2001
Cancer bombs 10 - 16 December 1998
© Copyright Al-Ahram Weekly. All rights reserved
Send a letter to the Editor
Updated every Saturday at 11.00 GMT, 2pm local time
Al-Ahram Organisation
The VISIE Foundation