What They
Knew and When They Knew It…
Bob
Zimmerman wrote: For Immediate Release: April
18, 2004 9/11—Bush-Cheney-Rice…
What They Knew and When They Knew It… Bush, Cheney and Rice knew 9/11
was
imminent; they had intelligence warnings describing al Qaeda’s plan to
use our
commercial jets to attack the World Trade
Center and Washington, D.C. The
highest levels of the Bush administration repeatedly and intentionally
lied
about what they knew and when they
knew it. The Bush administration failed to take appropriate action on
numerous
actionable intelligence reports and briefings, including a highly
classified
presidential daily briefing memo (PDB) dated August 6, 2001 entitled
Bin Laden
Determined to Strike inside the U.S. That PDB cont! ained
much “actionable intelligence,” including
information about active al Qaeda cells in the U.S. and the training of
prospective terrorists at military and commercial flight
schools—high-level
U.S. State Department permission is required for civilian pilot
training at
military flight schools. Why was such permission granted to the
terrorists?
Bush, Cheney, and Rice chose to
ignore the al Qaeda threat warnings; they failed to task and follow-up
with the
FBI and the CIA; and it is uncontested that they intentionally failed
to warn
and protect the American people. Prior to 9/11, only privileged
government
personnel like Attorney General Ashcroft were warned to avoid air
travel; the
AG cancelled his air travel plans; but the American people were not
alerted;
the American people were left fully exposed to the al Qaeda attack and
3,000
people were murdered. Who warned AG Ashcroft and failed to warn the
American
people? Why did AG Ashcroft tell FBI Director Thomas
Pickard that he wanted no further
briefings on terrorist threats?
The post-9/11 evidentiary record
clearly shows presidential gross negligence, and perhaps even
complicity in
9/11. The slowly unfolding tale of what really happened on and before
9/11 is
an overwhelming tale of governmental dysfunction or worse. Why did
Bush,
Cheney, and Rice deliberately and repeatedly lie to us saying they had
received
no warnings that a 9/11-type attack was imminent? Why have they spent 2
½ years
deliberately covering up what really happened on and before 9/11? Was
it
because high-level Bush policy formulators had previously prepared the
infamous
Project for a New American Century (PNAC) policy initiative suggesting
that
America needed another Pearl Harbor before it could launch a ! War of
Terror on
the world? The
Bush-Cheney-Rice cover-up of what
really happened on 9/11 is steadily unraveling. The American people are
intent
on learning precisely what Bush, Cheney, and Rice knew about 9/11, and
when
they knew it. Yet for over two-years the Bush administration stalled
every
inquiry. Bush and Cheney opted for strict secrecy. They refused to
testify and
refused to let Rice testify before the official 9/11 investigating
commission.
Why were Bush and Cheney afraid to let Rice testify under oath? Why do
Bush and
Cheney refuse to testify under oath? Why has Bush refused to release
nearly 70
documents that promise to shed even more light on what really happened on and
before 9/11? Why
did it take over two years of begging by the wives of the victims of
9/11
before Bush acceded to an official investigating commission? Why is
Bush afraid
to! testify before the commission without Cheney holding his hand? Why,
knowing
that 9/11 was imminent, did the highest levels of the Bush
administration do
nothing to alert and protect us? Was the Bush administration complicit
in the
attack? If so, many in the Bush administration, including Bush, Cheney,
and
Rice deserve long prison sentences. We now know: #The PNAC
makes clear that certain Bush
war and foreign policy formulators were
eager for another Pearl Harbor - type attack on the U.S. #Spending
over $30 billion a year bought
us much “actionable intelligence” regarding the imminent 9/11 terrorist
attacks. Unfortunately, the Bush administration chose to ignore that
intelligence. On and before 9/11 our government should have been at the
highest
state of defence readiness. #Shortly
after 9/11, and at a time when
all U.S. commercial airliners were grounded and with Osama bin Laden
under
official criminal indictment, the Bush
administration secretly spirited members of Osama bin
Laden’s family and
many Saudis who may have helped fund the 9/11 attacks out of the U.S.
Thomas
Kean former Republican governor of New Jersey, now chair of the
official 9/11
investigating commission, confirmed this. On C-SPAN, on April 14, 2004
he added
that the request for the evacuation of bin Laden’s family came from the
Saudi
Embassy. He added that the evacuees were officially questioned before
boarding
the six jetliners. #Rice lied
under oath when she said there
was no “silver bullet” that could have prevented 9/11. The relatively
simple
task of hardening the cockpit doors would have prevented 9/11. Arrests
of known
Al Qaeda terrorists and financiers in the U.S. could have prevented
9/11.
Capturing the al Qaeda terrorists and closing their training camps
could have
prevented 9/11. A credentialed national security advisor and a Bush
administration that was “on the job,” could have prevented 9/11. Why
were these
and many other means for prev! enting 9/11 intentionally ignored? #Bush,
Cheney, and Rice repeatedly lied
about what they knew about al Qaeda’s determination to strike within
the U.S.
It is now clear that there were many credible warnings, including the
now
famous August 6 PDB and the “Phoenix memo.” The Bush administration
knew al
Qaeda was training five times the
number of terrorists than the FBI and CIA were training as agents and
analysts.
Why did our government fail to realize the implications? #Unlike most
of the rest of us, Bush,
Cheney, Rumsfeld, Tenet, and Rice knew more than enough about al
Qaeda’s plans
to know that the first plane to strike the WTC was the work of the al
Qaeda
terrorists. Why do they say they did not realize America was under
attack until
WTC Building 2 was struck? #Rice was
intentionally deceptive under
oath when she said that “most of the intelligence chatter” regarding
9/11 was
vague and did not specify time, place, and manner. She did not say that
all
such chatter was vague. She failed to mention that in previous
testimony she
said that on September10, 2001 a report stating that 9/11 was imminent
sat on
her desk unread. #The Bush
administration failed to alert
the American to the 9/11 attack. Prior to 9/11, AG Ashcroft, former San
Francisco mayor Willie Brown, and other notables were alerted to the
risks of
flying on commercial airliners. Why were the American people, the
Pentagon, the
FAA, NORAD, the WTC, and the airlines and their crews not alerted? #The
“official story” regarding why
NORAD, our first line of defence, was looking “outward,” over the
Atlantic (in
Cold War posture), rather than inward to protect the homeland, is
nothing but
bureaucratic nonsensical cover-up. Why was our homeland defence posture
nothing
but leftovers from the Cold War? #Why is the
“official story” about why
the Pentagon was not protected not more deeply explored by the 9/11
commission?
Many people believe it is even loopier than the “official story”
regarding the
collapse of Building 7. #On 9/11,
“speculators” reaped vast
profits selling short the stocks of the airline companies whose planes
were
hijacked? Who are these
speculators? What did they know? When
and how did they know what they knew? #Well before
9/11 Florida governor Jeb
Bush authorized the drafting of an Executive Order 01-261 authorizing
him to
place the Florida National Guard under his command if warranted by a
terrorist
attack—the functional equivalent of martial law. The order was signed
by Jeb
Bush on September 7, 2001. What prompted Bush’s brother to draft and
sign that
order? #Bush
vacationed at his Texas ranch
knowing the 9/11 al Qaeda attack was imminent. While our soldiers labor
24
hours a day, every day, Bush has effectively vacationed, golfed,
campaigned,
and watched reruns of old baseball games for fully ¾ of his
presidency. On or
about 9/10 Bush flew to Florida to visit with his brother Governor Jeb
Bush. On
9/11, while the al Qaeda attack was in progress our Commander-In-Chief
was
busily engaged in a goat story with second-graders at the Emma E.
Booker School
in Sarasota, Florida #According
to Gwen Rigell, principal of the Booker School, Verizon installed 49
telephone
lines at the school just prior to Bush’s supposedly routine visit. Is
the
installation of so many telephone lines at an elementary school prior
to a
presidential visit routine, or was the Secret Service expecting an
attack? #At a press
conference held at the Booker
School on the morning of 9/11, Bush lied about when and how he learned
about
the terrorist attack on the WTC. #Rice lied
when she said no one could
have imagined that commercial airplanes could be used as guided
missiles. The
potential use of airplanes as missiles is exceedingly well documented.
In fact,
Bush had been threatened with a Kamikaze-type attack while attending a
G-8
summit in Italy in July, 2001, and
counter-terrorist chief Richard Clarke created detailed measures to
prevent an
9/11-type attack at the summer Olympic games in Atlanta, Georgia. #Bush and the
highest levels of his
administration have gone to great lengths to cover-up what really
happened on
and before 9/11. Osama bin Laden declared war on the U.S. in 1996 and
again in
1998. The U.S. response to that declaration was timid and grossly
insufficient.
When President Clinton sent a strong counter terrorism bill to
Congress,
Republicans stripped it of its teeth. #Bush said he
launched the War on Terror
because he was “tired of swatting flies,” another blatant lie when you
consider
the fact that his administration ignored the al Qaeda threat and its
previous
attacks, including that on the USS Cole. Was NORAD also tired of
“swatting
flies?”
#CIA Director George Tenet and the FBI knew of active al
Qaeda cells in
the U.S., they knew prospective terrorists were enrolled in flight
training
schools, and they knew of wire transfers to fund terrorist activity.
Throughout
August 2001, at the time “chatter” about an attack by al Qaeda was
high, CIA
Director Tenet and President Bush vacationed and were not in contact
with each
other. Why were they incommunicado? Why did the FBI and the CIA not act
to
crush al Qaeda when they declared war on us? For years after al Qaeda’s
declaration of war, why was only 3.5% of the FBI budget spent on
counter
terrorism activities? #Rice lied
under oath when she attributed
the failure to prevent 9/11 to certain long-standing “structural
problems”
between the CIA and the FBI.” The August 6 PDB and much testimony
before the
9/11 commission confirms regular cooperation and communication between
them;
thus, for Rice and others to blame 9/11 communication failures is pure
cover-up. Rice said the August 6 PDB
scared her; Bush said it comforted him; these are disturbingly
diverse interpretations of the al Qaeda terrorist threat on our
homeland. #Rice lied
under oath when she said that
following up with the FBI about al Qaeda was not her job. Helping to
make America
secure was her only job. #Rice lied
under oath when she said she
could not recall whether she had informed Bush that al Qaeda was
operating in
the U.S. It is simply not possible for people as bright as Rice to
forget such
conversations. #Yet
unconfirmed by Bush, Bush’s brother Marvin was a principal in
Stratesec, Inc, formerly Securacom. From 1995 to 2001, that firm
provided
security services at the World Trade Center and to United Airlines.
Securacom
was backed by a Kuwaiti-American investment company with ties to the
Bush
family. #World Trade
Center (WTC) Building 7
collapsed in exactly the same way as WTC buildings 1 and 2 even though
it was
not hit by an airliner. #The collapse
of WTC buildings 1, 2, and
7 looks to many more like professional demolition than the result of
the al
Qaeda attack. #Five hours
after the collapse of
buildings 1 and 2, one of the owners of the WTC says he had Building 7
“pulled”
down. Yet, Building 7 could not be “pulled” down by its owner unless it
had
been previously wired for demolition, an illegal task that would
require far
more than five hours. #Perhaps the
commercial airliner that
crashed in Pennsylvania had been targeted for Building 7 and Building 7
was
“pulled” down out of fear that the minor fires in Building 7 would set
off the
explosives or that the explosives would be found. #NORAD,
America’s first line of domestic
air defense, was not alerted in time to thwart the 9/11terrorist
attack.
Coincidentally, just three months prior to 9/11 responsibility for
ordering
NORAD into defensive action shifted to Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld.
(See June
1, 2001 Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Instruction revision
(CJCS3610.01A). # The Bush
administration knew al Qaeda
favoured the WTC and buildings in Washington, D.C. as targets and knew
of their
predilection for revisiting targets. Why was nothing done to protect
these
targets? #We now know
that the Bush family and
Bush friends and supporters are pocketing staggering profits from
Bush’s War on
Terror. #After
failing to protect us from the
9/11 attack, Bush had the audacity to launch his 2004 presidential
campaign
with a doctored TV ad that portrays him as the nations’ protector
against
terrorism when, as the facts clearly show, it was his administration’s
inept
leadership and his heavy vacation schedule that failed the American
people on
9/11. #Thomas Kean
said that with real
leadership 9/11 would have been prevented. He said, “This was not
something
that had to happen.” Kean closed the interview promising additional
revelations
in the near future but, the next day, in a follow-up interview on ABC’s
Nightline, he appeared far more cautious; if you looked closely, you
could
almost see Karl Rove’s and Dick Cheney’s heel prints on his face. Conclusion:
Many Americans and most of
the world now view the Bush War on Terror as a War of Terror, an
evolving
global nightmare for everyone except for the few who personally reap
vast
profits from perpetual pre-emptive war. Bush’s former director of
counter-terrorism, Richard Clarke, has testified under oath and said
that Bush
failed to take speedy action against al Qaeda, and that Bush’s invasion
of Iraq
has increased America’s risk of future terrorist attacks, making the
world far
less safe. There are now more than enough connected dots to warrant
either
immediate indictments or the commencement of impeachment proceedings.
Concerned
Americans and the Congress should demand nothing less.
The
crucial question is: Will the
official 9/11 investigating commission continue the cover-up and merely
accuse
the Bush administration of gross negligence,
or will their findings lead to
official charges of treason?
# # # # #To
unsubscribe:UxorPress@usa.com. A public
service project by Bob Zimmerman, author of: The American Challenge: Twenty-One Winning
Strategies for the 21st Century
www.bookmasters.com/americanchallenge.
Contacts:
Bobbi Pallas at 415-383-8481, or
BobZimmerman@usa.com. |